32 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Crow
a76f2ca268
Refactor HasSpell/HasAura and convert spellIds to constants (#2435)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to mod-playerbots, please make sure that
you...
1. Submit your PR to the test-staging branch, not master.
2. Read the guidelines below before submitting.
3. Don't delete parts of this template.

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: We prioritize STABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND
PREDICTABILITY over behavioral realism.

Every action and decision executes PER BOT AND PER TRIGGER. Small
increases in logic complexity scale
poorly across thousands of bots and negatively affect all. We prioritize
a stable system over a smarter
one. Bots don't need to behave perfectly; believable behavior is the
goal, not human simulation.
Default behavior must be cheap in processing; expensive behavior must be
opt-in.

Before submitting, make sure your changes aligns with these principles.
-->

## Pull Request Description
<!-- Describe what this change does and why it is needed -->

This is a PR to follow-up on a discussion with @kadeshar during the
recent mage armor PR. Main changes:
- Add new PlayerbotAI::HasSpell() overload that accepts a string for the
spell name as an argument, in order to replace repeated
bot->HasSpell(spellId) checks for places where multiple ranks of a spell
are checked, and to replace a few calls to AI_VALUE(uint32, "spell id",
...) where it existed only to check for the spell being known.
- Removed PlayerbotAI::HasAura() overload that takes a spell Id as an
argument. It is rarely used, and the few instances of its usage are
easily replaced with AC's Unit::HasAura(), which is the predominant
usage for spell Id aura checks already anyway.
- When modifying DruidPullStrategy to use the new HasSpell() method, I
went ahead and also simplified the file overall to pare down duplication
(for example, the first check in CanCastSpell is for the spell Id so we
don't need to separately check it before calling CanCastSpell()). I then
did the same for other pull strategies so they can be consistent.
- Changed many magic numbers for spell Ids to be defined as compile-time
constants. I didn't do this throughout the code, but I did in the files
where I was making changes anyway due to the HasSpell() and/or HasAura()
changes.

## Feature Evaluation
<!--
If your PR is very minimal (comment typo, wrong ID reference, etc), and
it is very obvious it will not have
any impact on performance, you may skip these question. If necessary, a
maintainer may ask you for them later.
-->

<!-- Please answer the following: -->
- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior.
- Describe the **processing cost** when this logic executes across many
bots.

  - Minimum logic is described above.
  - Processing cost shouldn't change much. See Impact Assessment below.

## How to Test the Changes
<!--
- Step-by-step instructions to test the change.
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, number of bots, specific
configuration).
- Expected behavior and how to verify it.
-->

## Impact Assessment
<!-- As a generic test, before and after measure of pmon (playerbot pmon
tick) can help you here. -->
- Does this change increase per-bot/per-tick processing or risk scaling
poorly with thousands of bots?
    - - [ ] No, not at all
    - - [x] Minimal impact (**explain below**)
    - - [ ] Moderate impact (**explain below**)

- Passing a string for the spell to check for it being known or the aura
being present is more taxing than looking up a spell Id, although the
usefulness of the string-based overload is for situations with spells
that have multiple ranks.

- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)



- Does this change add new decision branches or increase maintenance
complexity?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

  - I think these changes should simplify maintenance complexity.

## AI Assistance
<!--
AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
We expect contributors to be honest about what they do and do not
understand.
-->
Was AI assistance used while working on this change?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)
<!--
If yes, please specify:
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation).
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated, and whether it
was thoroughly reviewed.
-->

- I had AI make many of the changes and then review since they were
pretty mundane (for example, I'd tell it to just take all the magic
numbers from a file and define them in an anonymous namespace, then
replace the magic numbers with the spell constants). There isn't
anything complicated in this PR; it was mostly busywork.

<!--
TRANSLATIONS:
Anything new that the bots say in chat must be in a translatable format.
This is done using GetBotTextOrDefault,
which you can search for in the codebase to find examples. Your code
needs to have English as the default fallback,
while the full translations need to be in an SQL update file. The
languages in the file are the nine language
options supported by AzerothCore: English, Korean, French, German,
Chinese, Taiwanese, Spanish, Spanish Mexico, and
Russian. See
data/sql/playerbots/updates/2025_12_27_ai_playerbot_fishing_text.sql as
an example of a translation SQL
update, whose content are called within the codebase at
src/strategy/actions/FishingAction.cpp
-->

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised.
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable.
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained.
- - [x] Any new bot dialogue lines are translated.
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed (Conf comments, WiKi commands).

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything else that's helpful to review or test your pull request.
-->
2026-06-07 08:14:53 -07:00
Keleborn
714bb6bca3
Shorten paths (#2396)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to mod-playerbots, please make sure that
you...
1. Submit your PR to the test-staging branch, not master.
2. Read the guidelines below before submitting.
3. Don't delete parts of this template.

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: We prioritize STABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND
PREDICTABILITY over behavioral realism.

Every action and decision executes PER BOT AND PER TRIGGER. Small
increases in logic complexity scale
poorly across thousands of bots and negatively affect all. We prioritize
a stable system over a smarter
one. Bots don't need to behave perfectly; believable behavior is the
goal, not human simulation.
Default behavior must be cheap in processing; expensive behavior must be
opt-in.

Before submitting, make sure your changes aligns with these principles.
-->

## Pull Request Description
<!-- Describe what this change does and why it is needed -->
This is designed to significantly shorten the overall path while
maintaining the more detailed structure. I tried to follow the principle
of removing any folder that had 1 or 2 files in it, shortenining
dungeon/raid names to acronyms, and removing instances when the base
name was in the file name (Like Raid) etc.


## Feature Evaluation
<!--
If your PR is very minimal (comment typo, wrong ID reference, etc), and
it is very obvious it will not have
any impact on performance, you may skip these question. If necessary, a
maintainer may ask you for them later.
-->

<!-- Please answer the following: -->
- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior.
- Describe the **processing cost** when this logic executes across many
bots.



## How to Test the Changes
<!--
- Step-by-step instructions to test the change.
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, number of bots, specific
configuration).
- Expected behavior and how to verify it.
-->



## Impact Assessment
<!-- As a generic test, before and after measure of pmon (playerbot pmon
tick) can help you here. -->
- Does this change increase per-bot/per-tick processing or risk scaling
poorly with thousands of bots?
    - - [x] No, not at all
    - - [ ] Minimal impact (**explain below**)
    - - [ ] Moderate impact (**explain below**)



- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)



- Does this change add new decision branches or increase maintenance
complexity?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)



## AI Assistance
<!--
AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
We expect contributors to be honest about what they do and do not
understand.
-->
Was AI assistance used while working on this change?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)
<!--
If yes, please specify:
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation).
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated, and whether it
was thoroughly reviewed.
-->

Plan and execute

<!--
TRANSLATIONS:
Anything new that the bots say in chat must be in a translatable format.
This is done using GetBotTextOrDefault,
which you can search for in the codebase to find examples. Your code
needs to have English as the default fallback,
while the full translations need to be in an SQL update file. The
languages in the file are the nine language
options supported by AzerothCore: English, Korean, French, German,
Chinese, Taiwanese, Spanish, Spanish Mexico, and
Russian. See
data/sql/playerbots/updates/2025_12_27_ai_playerbot_fishing_text.sql as
an example of a translation SQL
update, whose content are called within the codebase at
src/strategy/actions/FishingAction.cpp
-->

## Final Checklist

- - [ ] Stability is not compromised.
- - [ ] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable.
- - [ ] Added logic complexity is justified and explained.
- - [ ] Any new bot dialogue lines are translated.
- - [ ] Documentation updated if needed (Conf comments, WiKi commands).

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything else that's helpful to review or test your pull request.
-->
2026-05-31 18:38:01 +02:00
dillyns
1bbed177c8
Add Nefarian Fear Ward action and trigger, along with Wild Magic trigger (#2412)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to mod-playerbots, please make sure that
you...
1. Submit your PR to the test-staging branch, not master.
2. Read the guidelines below before submitting.
3. Don't delete parts of this template.

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: We prioritize STABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND
PREDICTABILITY over behavioral realism.

Every action and decision executes PER BOT AND PER TRIGGER. Small
increases in logic complexity scale
poorly across thousands of bots and negatively affect all. We prioritize
a stable system over a smarter
one. Bots don't need to behave perfectly; believable behavior is the
goal, not human simulation.
Default behavior must be cheap in processing; expensive behavior must be
opt-in.

Before submitting, make sure your changes aligns with these principles.
-->

## Pull Request Description
<!-- Describe what this change does and why it is needed -->
For Nefarian in BWL, this does the following:
Mages - Ice block if the mage class call "Wild Magic" happens
Priests - Buff the current target of Nefarian with Fear Ward

## Feature Evaluation
<!--
If your PR is very minimal (comment typo, wrong ID reference, etc), and
it is very obvious it will not have
any impact on performance, you may skip these question. If necessary, a
maintainer may ask you for them later.
-->

<!-- Please answer the following: -->
- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior.
- Describe the **processing cost** when this logic executes across many
bots.



## How to Test the Changes
<!--
- Step-by-step instructions to test the change.
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, number of bots, specific
configuration).
- Expected behavior and how to verify it.
-->
Go to Nefarian (id 11583) or his phase 1 form (id 10162) in BWL with a
mage and a priest bot.
During phase 2, the priest bot should cast fear ward on whoever nefarian
is targeting.
Wait for a mage class call. Once it happens the mage bot should cast ice
block (if its available) to remove the Wild Magic debuff.


## Impact Assessment
<!-- As a generic test, before and after measure of pmon (playerbot pmon
tick) can help you here. -->
- Does this change increase per-bot/per-tick processing or risk scaling
poorly with thousands of bots?
    - - [x] No, not at all
    - - [ ] Minimal impact (**explain below**)
    - - [ ] Moderate impact (**explain below**)



- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)



- Does this change add new decision branches or increase maintenance
complexity?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)



## AI Assistance
<!--
AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
We expect contributors to be honest about what they do and do not
understand.
-->
Was AI assistance used while working on this change?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)
<!--
If yes, please specify:
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation).
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated, and whether it
was thoroughly reviewed.
-->
AI assistance was used to explore how dungeon/raid strats are
implemented and to explore examples.
All code has been reviewed


<!--
TRANSLATIONS:
Anything new that the bots say in chat must be in a translatable format.
This is done using GetBotTextOrDefault,
which you can search for in the codebase to find examples. Your code
needs to have English as the default fallback,
while the full translations need to be in an SQL update file. The
languages in the file are the nine language
options supported by AzerothCore: English, Korean, French, German,
Chinese, Taiwanese, Spanish, Spanish Mexico, and
Russian. See
data/sql/playerbots/updates/2025_12_27_ai_playerbot_fishing_text.sql as
an example of a translation SQL
update, whose content are called within the codebase at
src/strategy/actions/FishingAction.cpp
-->

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised.
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable.
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained.
- - [x] Any new bot dialogue lines are translated.
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed (Conf comments, WiKi commands).

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything else that's helpful to review or test your pull request.
-->
2026-05-30 07:14:38 -07:00
Keleborn
82a92f6296 Modify Illidan distbeyondtrap 2026-05-26 09:01:56 -07:00
HennyWilly
ab196cb532
Refactoring of BWL strategy (#2397)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to mod-playerbots, please make sure that
you...
1. Submit your PR to the test-staging branch, not master.
2. Read the guidelines below before submitting.
3. Don't delete parts of this template.

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: We prioritize STABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND
PREDICTABILITY over behavioral realism.

Every action and decision executes PER BOT AND PER TRIGGER. Small
increases in logic complexity scale
poorly across thousands of bots and negatively affect all. We prioritize
a stable system over a smarter
one. Bots don't need to behave perfectly; believable behavior is the
goal, not human simulation.
Default behavior must be cheap in processing; expensive behavior must be
opt-in.

Before submitting, make sure your changes aligns with these principles.
-->

## Pull Request Description
<!-- Describe what this change does and why it is needed -->
This PR refactors the Blackwing Lair strategy to align with newer raid
strategy implementations.
It extracts repeated Blackwing Lair spell IDs, game object IDs, and
suppression device checks into a shared helper, so the action and
trigger code use the same centralized definitions instead of duplicating
literals and condition chains.
No gameplay behavior changes are expected.

This PR is intended as a base for follow-up PRs that introduce
additional boss-specific strategy logic.

## Feature Evaluation
<!--
If your PR is very minimal (comment typo, wrong ID reference, etc), and
it is very obvious it will not have
any impact on performance, you may skip these question. If necessary, a
maintainer may ask you for them later.
-->

<!-- Please answer the following: -->
- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior.
- Move existing BWL-specific constants and the suppression device
condition into a shared helper.
- Keep all existing trigger names, action names, spell IDs, game object
IDs, and condition checks unchanged.
- Update the affected action/trigger implementations to call the helper
instead of duplicating the same logic inline.
- Describe the **processing cost** when this logic executes across many
bots.
- No meaningful increase. The logic executed per bot remains effectively
the same.
- This refactor only replaces duplicated inline checks with a shared
helper function and named constants.
- There are no additional scans, branches, state tracking, or new
decision loops.

## How to Test the Changes
<!--
- Step-by-step instructions to test the change.
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, number of bots, specific
configuration).
- Expected behavior and how to verify it.
-->
Run the Blackwing Lair raid and check if the already implemented
features still work:
- _Onyxia Scale Cloak handling_: Confirm the bot still applies/checks
the same aura as before.
- _Suppression device handling_: Confirm bots still detect nearby active
suppression devices and turn them off under the same conditions as
before.
- _Chromaggus bronze affliction handling_: Confirm bots still use
Hourglass Sand if they have the bronze affliction.

## Impact Assessment
<!-- As a generic test, before and after measure of pmon (playerbot pmon
tick) can help you here. -->
- Does this change increase per-bot/per-tick processing or risk scaling
poorly with thousands of bots?
    - - [ ] No, not at all
    - - [x] Minimal impact (**explain below**)
    - - [ ] Moderate impact (**explain below**)

A small helper call was introduced for the suppression device check, so
there is technically a minor additional call overhead compared to the
previous inline condition. In practice, the executed logic, iteration
scope, and decision flow remain unchanged, so the impact is negligible
and does not introduce meaningful scaling risk.

- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

- Does this change add new decision branches or increase maintenance
complexity?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

## AI Assistance
<!--
AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
We expect contributors to be honest about what they do and do not
understand.
-->
Was AI assistance used while working on this change?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)
<!--
If yes, please specify:
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation).
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated, and whether it
was thoroughly reviewed.
-->
AI was used for review support and drafting the pull request text.
The refactoring itself was done manually.

<!--
TRANSLATIONS:
Anything new that the bots say in chat must be in a translatable format.
This is done using GetBotTextOrDefault,
which you can search for in the codebase to find examples. Your code
needs to have English as the default fallback,
while the full translations need to be in an SQL update file. The
languages in the file are the nine language
options supported by AzerothCore: English, Korean, French, German,
Chinese, Taiwanese, Spanish, Spanish Mexico, and
Russian. See
data/sql/playerbots/updates/2025_12_27_ai_playerbot_fishing_text.sql as
an example of a translation SQL
update, whose content are called within the codebase at
src/strategy/actions/FishingAction.cpp
-->

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised.
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable.
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained.
- - [x] Any new bot dialogue lines are translated.
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed (Conf comments, WiKi commands).

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything else that's helpful to review or test your pull request.
-->
This PR is intended to be behavior-preserving only.
The main change is consolidation of repeated Blackwing Lair constants
and suppression device logic into a shared helper used by both actions
and triggers. Review can focus on verifying that the extracted helper
matches the previous conditions.
2026-05-22 19:23:49 -07:00
Mat
c7b4b9aa80
ICC V2, Autogear BiS cmd (#2363)
## Pull Request Description
<!-- Describe what this change does and why it is needed -->

Big thanks to @kadeshar for providing the bis list for many raids and
ilvls :D

Video demo for ICC 25HC:
https://studio.youtube.com/video/nACyjn817iQ/edit

Video demo for autogear bis chat command:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YqyVBaSb2g

split main IccActions.cpp into sperate per boss .cpp files
changed style to be more aligned with
https://www.azerothcore.org/wiki/cpp-code-standards (WIP)
added bisicc chat command for bots to gear with ICC bis gear if autogear
and bisicc is enabled in cfg
https://gist.github.com/metal0/0bb094bf65d27e17044308ad0646cae1 bis list
used

LM

Added multiple spike marking and focus for faster spike clearing, each
spike will get its own kill group, tank spike will never get melee bots
(only assist tank and ranged dps)
Added coldflame detection so that melee bots dont go for spikes that are
in flames
During bonestorm assist tank will go far away spot so that once
bonestorm is fixed, LM will bounce back and forth from MT to AT (atm it
targets randomly, it should always pick furthest target)
Coldflame avoidance is handled by avoid AOE, important to keep it on in
cfg

Tested on ALL diffs

LDW

Improved skull marking of adds, add handling by tanks and dps
Changed 1st position for ranged bots for easier adds handling in HC and
NM
Improved tanking logic for tanks, assist tank will focus on collecting
adds and bring them near boss
Real players will also get cyclone aura when mind controlled
Improved ranged position during 2nd phase, they should not get stuck in
corners/walls anymore
Tanks will remove LDW ToI aura in HC (really hard to tank with it since
many things are happening at once)
Added Cheat for LDW fight to help tanks with agro in 2nd phase of heroic
modes
Changed tank position in phase 2 closer to pillars opposed to stairs
(bots love to fall thru floor and run thru walls if near them) this
fixed the issue
Fixed edge case for escaping from shades, it could happen that multiple
shades would target bot, and it was running from 1st one he found, now
it will run form all that are targeting it
Hunters will cast viper sting now, to increase shield draining speed

Tested on ALL diffs
Edit 19.5. :
Tested 25hc with autogear bis gear, playebots cfg ICC cheats off, world
cfg ICC buff on max (30%)
In short cleared LDW without ICC cheats with bis gear but unoptimized
enchants, talents, gems. I still recommend using ICC cheats for better
and fun experience.

GS

Changed triggers and actions to enable cross faction play
Assist tank will now actually tank adds on friendly ship
Dps will properly jump to attack mage and go back to their ship, if
stuck on enemy ship /p reset, /p summon or /p follow
fixed trigger for cannons, if cannons are frozen bots wont try to mount
them anymore which prevented them from attacking mage properly
bots will use rocket packs to jump to and from enemy ship instead of
teleporting
Main tank will now jump 1st. tank enemy boss and wait until all bots
have jumped back before he jumps back
All bots will wait for main tank to engage enemy captain before jumping
to enemy ship
Cannons will focus rockets 1st, then other adds now (for when gs gets
scripted)
Rdps will focus nearby adds on enemy ship and mark with star rti icon
when there is no deep freeze

todo: remove tanking bypass when core fixes enemy ship boss threat
reseting
Tested crossfaction on horde with single ally bot, ally bot did
everything right, need to test more.
note horde side is heavily bugged due to threat issue of adds, tanks
cant take threat, on ally its somewhat ok, on horde rip. Horde is
doable, but annoying cus of threat issue.


Tested on ALL diffs

DBS

Remade tank taunt logic, tanks should now properly taunt boss and let
other tank taunt it if they get rune of blood
Tanks will tank adds better now, no loose adds anymore

Tested on ALL diffs

Dogs

Remade tank taunt logic, tanks should now properly taunt boss and let
other tank taunt it if they get 8 mortal wounds stacks
Tanks will tank adds better now, no loose adds anymore

Tested on ALL diffs


Festergut

Hunters sometimes populated row 0 which would make them in melee range
of the boss (bad for dps). They should pick correct rows now
Healers will populate row 0 1st then other rows for optimal healing
position
Ranged bots should properly choose unique spots to avoid stacking when
there is no spore present
Remade tank taunt logic, tanks should now properly taunt boss and let
other tank taunt it if they get 6 gastric bloat stacks
Changed ranged spore position closer to boss
Spore bots should be able to attack/do non movement action when they
have spore and are in position
Solved malleable goo detection via direct boss hooks to detect boss
targets!

Tested on ALL diffs

Rotface

Tanks should not fight over big ooze anymore
Improved big ooze kiting
Improved small ooze stacking logic (when no big ooze present, stack at
small ooze position, when big ooze is present move to it)
Fixed edge cases when main and assist tank get small ooze (they used to
move to big ooze, that was really bad since main tank would start to
tank big ooze and get hit by big ooze, assist tank would stop kiting and
get hit by big ooze)
stopped mutated plague from dispelling instantly (as fight goes on,
rotface cast mutated plague more and more, thus making it impossible to
pass due to sheer numbers of small oozes and big oozes on the map, this
will delay their spawning and give enough time for bots to handle them
properly)
Fixed edge case of multiple small oozes and big oozes being alive at
same time (bots would detect wrong oozes and wipe raid or get stuck)
Improved flood avoidance
Improved ranged positioning in heroic mode, instead of letting them
choose positions (which is a nightmare on dynamic fight as rotface, they
now will choose 1 spot of 22 premade ones and populate them based on
guid and adopt spot based on flood position)
Improved Explosion avoidance by making bots remember their starting
position so that they can return to it after big ooze explode, their
movement is not chaotic anymore, and improved timers, they will wait 2
sec at new position before returning to starting position so that they
can avoid explosion projectiles properly, they should also avoid moving
to other bots starting positions.
These changes ensure minimal movements so that bot can do maximum dps
possible.

Tested on ALL diffs

PP

Fixed many logic conflicts that caused bots to freeze, do bad dps to
ooze/clouds
Fixed triggers and multipliers
Improved Gas Cloud avoidance, bloated bot will now remember its previous
position to avoid backtracking/getting stuck in corners
Added boss hooks to finally detect malleable goo, it is not an npc,
object or creature and PP doesn't target anyone, bots will flee from it
now
Boss stacking now only in last phase
Added cheats for players also (if enabled in cfg) only bots used to get
auras
Fixed tank switching in last phase, atm PP doesn't apply aura, but it
should work, since same logic works for dogs, festergut and dbs
Assist tank will now become abo if there is no abo before first puddle
appears
Abo will during puddles, slow oozes, slash boss & oozes
In last phase assist will return to normal

Tested on ALL diffs
Edit 19.5. :
Tested 25hc with autogear bis gear, playebots cfg ICC cheats off, world
cfg ICC buff on max (30%)
Tanks switched in last phase flawlesly and shared stacks as they should
(mutated plague got fixed in core)
In short cleared PP without ICC cheats with bis gear but unoptimized
enchants, talents, gems. I still recommend using ICC cheats for better
and fun experience.

BPC

Added center position to prevent bots from pulling BQL or other adds
when they glitch thru walls/floor and thus resetting raid back to icc
entrance teleporter
Added additional z axis resetting since bots like to "fly" up in the air
when attacking kinetic bombs.
using cheat bypass for ball of inferno flames (atm bugged, doesn't
shrink), bots will simply kill them when they spawn.
Improved tanking for main tanks, improved collection of dark nuclei for
assist tank
Improved kinetics bomb handling
Improved shock vortex spreading
Improved valaran spreading for ranged
Added shock vortex (non empowered) detection to avoid it while moving
into safe positions
Fixed jittery movement

Tested on ALL diffs

BQL

Removed center position block so that bots can spread our easier in 25
mode, not ideal but makes 25hc easier
Replaced repulsion based spreading, now each bot will have its own spot
and move if needed to new spot
Improved air phase spreading
Fixed assist tank taking 1st bite

Tested on ALL diffs

VDW

Due to recent core changes bots got bugged in portals if no real player
entered and changed Z axis, if there was no z axis change bots would
chill under the cloud on the ground and do nothing. I could not figure
out how to fix this (thus breaking immersion) without force teleporting
them to the clouds.
Bots that go into portals will now teleport at the same time to clouds
instead of following leader bot.
Added feature that if players enter the portal, player with lowest guid
will become bot "leader" and they will follow that player so that there
is at least a little bit of immersion left.
Fixed cloud collection for Heroic Mode, bots will now time clouds more
precisely to avoid loosing stack due to not picking them up
Improved RTI marking
Improved group splitting
Improved zombie kiting and avoiding explosion

Tested on ALL diffs

Sindragosa

Bots will mark tomb positions with red smoke bomb in air phase so that
real player know where to go with when beacon on them
in last phase they will mark with blue smoke tomb position
Fixed tank positioning
Fixed wrong tomb choice and positioning
Fixed tomb marking
In last phase healers will stack with melee to allow boss healing
In last phase when waiting for mystic debuff to pass, bots will damage
tomb like in air phase to speed up the kill

todo: tank switch to reset mystic buffet stacks
Tested on ALL diffs
Edit 19.5. :
Tested 25hc with autogear bis gear, playebots cfg ICC cheats off, world
cfg ICC buff on max (30%)
In short cleared LDW without ICC cheats with bis gear but unoptimized
enchants, talents, gems. I still recommend using ICC cheats for better
and fun experience.

LK

Changed add gathering logic for 1st phase and winter phase, instead of
tank moving to shamblings, he will keep taunting until they agro him.
necrotic plague is easy now, ditched complex timing logic for a simple
logic ( move to shambling, wait until dispeled, go back. Healers dont
dispel until defile ally is near shambling )
Fixed winter phase gathering logic, assist tank will now properly move
to raging spirits asap and bring them to main tank, melee dps will no
properly move behind/flank spirits and shamblings to avoid instant
death. Rdps will now properly focus frost orbs and adds, Transition
should also be smoother now, but still needs /p reset if they get stuck.
Other phases are ok, LK fight is now even better than before, but player
still need to know tactics and use multibot addon to help out bots when
needed, especially during defile phase since its random and position
matter for valkyrs and future defiles
Non winter phase AT will collect raging spirits and move them to main
tank, ranged bots will keep distance, melee bots will flank them to
avoid aoe
Defile, ditched complex spreading which was mostly gamble with boss
hooks to detect defile victim. If bot, bot will move away from raid, if
real player main tank will yell Player name move away defile.
bots will stay in center now if safe from defile, raging spirits or vile
spirits
Vile spirits soaking by assist tank. Assist tank will stand between
spirits and raid and chase spirits. healers are allowed to move from
position to heal assist tank. one hunter if alive will be at center
position to place traps to slow down spirits


HC

Real players will also get buffs if cheats are enabled now
Assist tank will now never move towards the raid to gather adds, instead
it will taunt them instead so that they come to it
Assist tank will rotate shamblings at all times away from raid
Assist tank will stun shamblings before transition to avoid shockwave
wipe
Winter phase ice sphere location changed, ranged will focus sphere
faster and better now
Fixed jittery movement and low dps during winter phase
Fixed most of the bots getting stuck during winter phase
Valkyrs will be properly marked now, one by one, in hc bots will now
ignore low hp valkyrs and focus on grabbing valkyrs or boss
After winter raging spirit will have top priority for killing
After winter ranged bots will 1st handle ice spheres then skull targets
Spirit bomb avoidance improved, main tank should not back track into
unsafe positions anymore


Since real player is leader its crucial that player know the tactics,
bots can not handle edge cases during the fight alone,
they need some of reset, follow, summon here and there since its a long
fight and things can go wrong.

Tested on ALL diffs
NOTE: If server crash, bots will sometimes drop ICC strategy even though
they are in ICC, simply re enter or write /p nc +ICC to re enable.
NOTE: addons that mark icons during fight could break bots, since icons
are used for RTI by bots
NOTE: I did not use any raiding addons besides unbot and multibot to
control bots
NOTE: In theory everything should work wihout ICC buff from world cfg,
and ICC cheats from playerbots cfg, didnt test it, didnt try, its too
hard core for hc mode to go raw, but it should be possible good luck :)
NOTE: For normal about 5k gs should be enough to do most bosses. For HC
T10 set + ICC 25 nm or HC gear + gems + enchants + buffs from cfg for
fun experience.
NOTE: As player its good to know every strategy for Bosses, so that you
can spot and help out with reset, follow, summon if bots seem stuck or
are doing something strange, a lot of stuff is happening on most fights
so expect some intervention with reset, summon, follow.

10 MAN 2-3 Healers, 2 Tanks, at least 1 hunter, at least one druid for
bress (its not set in stone, but most success with this setup)
25 MAN 6-7 Healers, 2 tanks, at least 1 hunter, at least 3-4 druids for
bress (its not set in stone, but most success with this setup)

GL & HF, happy raiding :D

Closes #1421 #2120
Fixes #1219 NOTE: Not all of them, I have updated affected changes in
#1219. Trash, quest, cheats are still nice to haves, but I don't see
working on that in near future.

Before posting bugs check #1219 and write there. As I said, I dont plan
to implement certain things in near future, but I am more than willing
to fix bugs that crash server if they happen ASAP.

<!--
Thank you for contributing to mod-playerbots, please make sure that
you...
1. Submit your PR to the test-staging branch, not master.
2. Read the guidelines below before submitting.
3. Don't delete parts of this template.

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: We prioritize STABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND
PREDICTABILITY over behavioral realism.

Every action and decision executes PER BOT AND PER TRIGGER. Small
increases in logic complexity scale
poorly across thousands of bots and negatively affect all. We prioritize
a stable system over a smarter
one. Bots don't need to behave perfectly; believable behavior is the
goal, not human simulation.
Default behavior must be cheap in processing; expensive behavior must be
opt-in.

Before submitting, make sure your changes aligns with these principles.
-->





## Feature Evaluation
<!--
If your PR is very minimal (comment typo, wrong ID reference, etc), and
it is very obvious it will not have
any impact on performance, you may skip these question. If necessary, a
maintainer may ask you for them later.
-->

<!-- Please answer the following: -->
- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior.
- Describe the **processing cost** when this logic executes across many
bots.



## How to Test the Changes
<!--
- Step-by-step instructions to test the change.
Enter ICC
Test Bosses

bis ICC command
type bisicc into party chat or whisper and bots will reply and equip
gear

- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, number of bots, specific
configuration).
NOTE: If server crash, bots will sometimes drop ICC strategy even though
they are in ICC, simply re enter or write /p nc +ICC to re enable.
NOTE: addons that mark icons during fight could break bots, since icons
are used for RTI by bots
NOTE: I did not use any raiding addons besides unbot and multibot to
control bots
NOTE: In theory everything should work wihout ICC buff from world cfg,
and ICC cheats from playerbots cfg, didnt test it, didnt try, its too
hard core for hc mode to go raw, but it should be possible good luck :)
NOTE: For normal about 5k gs should be enough to do most bosses. For HC
T10 set + ICC 25 nm or HC gear + gems + enchants + buffs from cfg for
fun experience.
NOTE: As player its good to know every strategy for Bosses, so that you
can spot and help out with reset, follow, summon if bots seem stuck or
are doing something strange, a lot of stuff is happening on most fights
so expect some intervention with reset, summon, follow.

10 MAN 2-3 Healers, 2 Tanks, at least 1 hunter, at least one druid for
bress (its not set in stone, but most success with this setup)
25 MAN 6-7 Healers, 2 tanks, at least 1 hunter, at least 3-4 druids for
bress (its not set in stone, but most success with this setup)
- Expected behavior and how to verify it.
If requirements are met, bots should not struggle with killing bosses
Compare to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nACyjn817iQ&t=460s
-->



## Impact Assessment
<!-- As a generic test, before and after measure of pmon (playerbot pmon
tick) can help you here. -->
- Does this change increase per-bot/per-tick processing or risk scaling
poorly with thousands of bots?
    - - [ ] No, not at all
    - - [X ] Minimal impact (**explain below**)
In theory it should not impact, didnt test with hi bot count or large
player count
    - - [ ] Moderate impact (**explain below**)



- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - - [X ] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)



- Does this change add new decision branches or increase maintenance
complexity?
    - - [ ] No
    - - [X ] Yes (**explain below**)

Impacts in raid, new actions, triggers
Impacts with new bisicc cmd that will gear bots
Everything should make it easier for maintenance since each boss is in
seperate file now


## AI Assistance
<!--
AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
We expect contributors to be honest about what they do and do not
understand.
-->
Was AI assistance used while working on this change?
- - [ ] No
- - [x ] Yes (**explain below**)
<!--
If yes, please specify:
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation).
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated, and whether it
was thoroughly reviewed.
-->

AI was used for analyzing code for ac code standard violations, edits
were made by me. It was used for fixing bugs, brainstorming and code
generation (for complex math problems, such as dynamicaly kiting oozes
around, assiging positions during multiple complex situations in rotface
encouter. Everything was checked and tested multiple times until it was
polished (to my abilites and understanding). It helped me to solve
Malleable goo detection, defile, by hooking directly to boss in order to
detect it, since it was detectable only by split second since it was not
npc, spell or object.


<!--
TRANSLATIONS:
Anything new that the bots say in chat must be in a translatable format.
This is done using GetBotTextOrDefault,
which you can search for in the codebase to find examples. Your code
needs to have English as the default fallback,
while the full translations need to be in an SQL update file. The
languages in the file are the nine language
options supported by AzerothCore: English, Korean, French, German,
Chinese, Taiwanese, Spanish, Spanish Mexico, and
Russian. See
data/sql/playerbots/updates/2025_12_27_ai_playerbot_fishing_text.sql as
an example of a translation SQL
update, whose content are called within the codebase at
src/strategy/actions/FishingAction.cpp
-->

## Final Checklist

- - [ x] Stability is not compromised.
- - [x ] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable.
- - [x ] Added logic complexity is justified and explained.
- - [x] Any new bot dialogue lines are translated.
- - [x ] Documentation updated if needed (Conf comments, WiKi commands).

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything else that's helpful to review or test your pull request.
-->
I have not tested with multiple players, or large servers or with 3k+
bots

---------

Co-authored-by: Keleborn <22352763+Celandriel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bash <hermensb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Revision <tkn963@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kadeshar <kadeshar@gmail.com>
2026-05-22 19:23:35 -07:00
Crow
9d787ca0b4
Make Vashj Strategy Compatible with Acore Bug & Use AI Instance for Targeting (#2391)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to mod-playerbots, please make sure that
you...
1. Submit your PR to the test-staging branch, not master.
2. Read the guidelines below before submitting.
3. Don't delete parts of this template.

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: We prioritize STABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND
PREDICTABILITY over behavioral realism.

Every action and decision executes PER BOT AND PER TRIGGER. Small
increases in logic complexity scale
poorly across thousands of bots and negatively affect all. We prioritize
a stable system over a smarter
one. Bots don't need to behave perfectly; believable behavior is the
goal, not human simulation.
Default behavior must be cheap in processing; expensive behavior must be
opt-in.

Before submitting, make sure your changes aligns with these principles.
-->

## Pull Request Description
<!-- Describe what this change does and why it is needed -->
Lady Vashj has been screwed up in Acore for a month or two. In Phase 2,
only one generator activates (instead of four). As a result, disabling
one generator brings Vashj into Phase 3. The strategy uses Vashj's HP +
unit state to determine phase--with the Acore bug, Vashj enters Phase 3
at <65% HP (instead of the correct <50% HP, as deactivating a generator
damages her by 5%) so under the current strategy, bots won't assume
Phase 3 strategies at the right moment. I tried looking into the issue
with Vashj in Acore and cannot figure it out, and I've had an issue open
with Acore and don't know if/when it will be fixed. In the meantime, I'm
modifying the strategy to use the shield barrier aura check on Vashj
instead so it will work regardless of Vashj's HP at the time the
generators are disabled. If/when Vashj is fixed, the strategy will still
work.

I also changed bot-side targeting checks throughout the strategies I've
written from GetVictim() and GetTarget() to using the AI's target state
via "current target." This approach I believe is the best way to
actually check for the target because a GetVictim() check can lock up
Elemental Shamans and Balance Druids due to them not being able to start
an attack to pass that check when outside of spell range, and a
GetTarget() check can occasionally not align with the target that the
bot is actually attacking.

- In effect, this should reduce cases where the bot AI thinks it is on
the right raid target but encounter logic disagrees because the live
victim or client selection is lagging or different.
- Exception: multipliers for blocking TankAssistAction still use a
GetVictim() check. This is because "current target" processes before
issuing an attack, and the targeting check for TankAssistAction is not
to suppress it if the bot hasn't actually issued an attack.

There is a lot more than could be refactored with past strategies to
make them better, but that's for another day. This PR is intended to be
limited and simple to review.

## Feature Evaluation
<!--
If your PR is very minimal (comment typo, wrong ID reference, etc), and
it is very obvious it will not have
any impact on performance, you may skip these question. If necessary, a
maintainer may ask you for them later.
-->

<!-- Please answer the following: -->
- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior.
- Describe the **processing cost** when this logic executes across many
bots.
Logic is described above. There should be no relevant impact on
processing cost.


## How to Test the Changes
<!--
- Step-by-step instructions to test the change.
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, number of bots, specific
configuration).
- Expected behavior and how to verify it.
-->

Attempt Lady Vashj with the current bugged version. After disabling the
lone generator, bots should enter Phase 3 strategies and the encounter
should be completable.

Otherwise, generally run raids, and confirm there are no issues with
bots switching targets or starting attacking.


## Impact Assessment
<!-- As a generic test, before and after measure of pmon (playerbot pmon
tick) can help you here. -->
- Does this change increase per-bot/per-tick processing or risk scaling
poorly with thousands of bots?
    - - [x] No, not at all
    - - [ ] Minimal impact (**explain below**)
    - - [ ] Moderate impact (**explain below**)



- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)



- Does this change add new decision branches or increase maintenance
complexity?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)



## AI Assistance
<!--
AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
We expect contributors to be honest about what they do and do not
understand.
-->
Was AI assistance used while working on this change?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)
<!--
If yes, please specify:
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation).
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated, and whether it
was thoroughly reviewed.
-->



<!--
TRANSLATIONS:
Anything new that the bots say in chat must be in a translatable format.
This is done using GetBotTextOrDefault,
which you can search for in the codebase to find examples. Your code
needs to have English as the default fallback,
while the full translations need to be in an SQL update file. The
languages in the file are the nine language
options supported by AzerothCore: English, Korean, French, German,
Chinese, Taiwanese, Spanish, Spanish Mexico, and
Russian. See
data/sql/playerbots/updates/2025_12_27_ai_playerbot_fishing_text.sql as
an example of a translation SQL
update, whose content are called within the codebase at
src/strategy/actions/FishingAction.cpp
-->

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised.
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable.
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained.
- - [x] Any new bot dialogue lines are translated.
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed (Conf comments, WiKi commands).

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything else that's helpful to review or test your pull request.
-->
2026-05-15 23:27:42 -07:00
Crow
05e8f4d82c
Implement Black Temple Strategies (#2381)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to mod-playerbots, please make sure that
you...
1. Submit your PR to the test-staging branch, not master.
2. Read the guidelines below before submitting.
3. Don't delete parts of this template.

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: We prioritize STABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND
PREDICTABILITY over behavioral realism.

Every action and decision executes PER BOT AND PER TRIGGER. Small
increases in logic complexity scale
poorly across thousands of bots and negatively affect all. We prioritize
a stable system over a smarter
one. Bots don't need to behave perfectly; believable behavior is the
goal, not human simulation.
Default behavior must be cheap in processing; expensive behavior must be
opt-in.

Before submitting, make sure your changes aligns with these principles.
-->

## Pull Request Description
<!-- Describe what this change does and why it is needed -->
This PR implements strategies for all bosses in the Black Temple. As
always, I’ve written these with the intent that all bosses be
completable with appropriate gear and 50/50 IP nerfs and boss HP
returned to TBC levels. Illidan is difficult at those parameters, but he
is certainly doable. You just won’t be able to roll a bunch of meme
specs or shitty compositions. Probably.


## Feature Evaluation
<!--
If your PR is very minimal (comment typo, wrong ID reference, etc), and
it is very obvious it will not have
any impact on performance, you may skip these question. If necessary, a
maintainer may ask you for them later.
-->

<!-- Please answer the following: -->
- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior.
- Describe the **processing cost** when this logic executes across many
bots.

My goal with raid strategies is the same—I’m not just trying to make
encounters doable but am trying to allow people to experience them in a
way that feels like they are part of a coordinated raid of real players.
To me, being able to achieve that is the minimum, and that requires
getting bots to respond to all major mechanics, even if they can
technically just be powered through.


## How to Test the Changes
<!--
- Step-by-step instructions to test the change.
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, number of bots, specific
configuration).
- Expected behavior and how to verify it.
-->
Run the Black Temple raid and see if my descriptions of strategies in
the next post check out.


## Impact Assessment
<!-- As a generic test, before and after measure of pmon (playerbot pmon
tick) can help you here. -->
- Does this change increase per-bot/per-tick processing or risk scaling
poorly with thousands of bots?
    - - [ ] No, not at all
    - - [x] Minimal impact (**explain below**)
    - - [ ] Moderate impact (**explain below**)
 
The performance impact exists only when the “blacktemple” strategy is
on. I’ve tested with pmon and done my best to properly gate checks to
limit the performance impact even during the instance and boss
encounters.


- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - - [ ] No
    - - [x] Yes (**explain why**)

The triggers and multipliers will be evaluated as long as the
"blacktemple" strategy is active, and it will be applied automatically
in the instance (and removed automatically when changing maps outside
the instance).


- Does this change add new decision branches or increase maintenance
complexity?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)



## AI Assistance
<!--
AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
We expect contributors to be honest about what they do and do not
understand.
-->
Was AI assistance used while working on this change?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)
<!--
If yes, please specify:
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation).
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated, and whether it
was thoroughly reviewed.
-->
GPT-5.4, mainly for calculations and things that are more intermediate
concepts that I’m not proficient with like lambdas.


<!--
TRANSLATIONS:
Anything new that the bots say in chat must be in a translatable format.
This is done using GetBotTextOrDefault,
which you can search for in the codebase to find examples. Your code
needs to have English as the default fallback,
while the full translations need to be in an SQL update file. The
languages in the file are the nine language
options supported by AzerothCore: English, Korean, French, German,
Chinese, Taiwanese, Spanish, Spanish Mexico, and
Russian. See
data/sql/playerbots/updates/2025_12_27_ai_playerbot_fishing_text.sql as
an example of a translation SQL
update, whose content are called within the codebase at
src/strategy/actions/FishingAction.cpp
-->

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised.
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable.
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained.
- - [x] Any new bot dialogue lines are translated.
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed (Conf comments, WiKi commands).

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything else that's helpful to review or test your pull request.
-->
2026-05-15 23:26:55 -07:00
Crow
5d9761c9e8
Implement Battle for Mount Hyjal Strategies (#2258)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to mod-playerbots, please make sure that
you...
1. Submit your PR to the test-staging branch, not master.
2. Read the guidelines below before submitting.
3. Don't delete parts of this template.

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: We prioritize STABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND
PREDICTABILITY over behavioral realism.

Every action and decision executes PER BOT AND PER TRIGGER. Small
increases in logic complexity scale
poorly across thousands of bots and negatively affect all. We prioritize
a stable system over a smarter
one. Bots don't need to behave perfectly; believable behavior is the
goal, not human simulation.
Default behavior must be cheap in processing; expensive behavior must be
opt-in.

Before submitting, make sure your changes aligns with these principles.
-->

### Contingent on
https://github.com/mod-playerbots/mod-playerbots/pull/2295/

## Pull Request Description
<!-- Describe what this change does and why it is needed -->
This PR implements raid strategies for all bosses in everybody's
favorite TBC instance, the Battle for Mount Hyjal. As before, I have
designed these all to work with IP with 50% damage and healing. I also
did not merge the 1.88x buff to Vanilla & TBC healing items that IP
recently implemented.

The next post will outline all implemented strategies.

Note: Set to draft for now as I may tweak Archimonde some more, but I
generally consider Hyjal complete, subject to comments.

## Feature Evaluation
<!--
If your PR is very minimal (comment typo, wrong ID reference, etc), and
it is very obvious it will not have
any impact on performance, you may skip these question. If necessary, a
maintainer may ask you for them later.
-->

<!-- Please answer the following: -->
- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior.
- Describe the **processing cost** when this logic executes across many
bots.

As with previous strategies, I've worked within the existing context of
actions/multipliers/triggers. This strategy does implement new spell
hooks, but I don't think that is problematic for performance, and I'll
explain why they are necessary in the next post.


## How to Test the Changes
<!--
- Step-by-step instructions to test the change.
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, number of bots, specific
configuration).
- Expected behavior and how to verify it.
-->



## Impact Assessment
<!-- As a generic test, before and after measure of pmon (playerbot pmon
tick) can help you here. -->
- Does this change increase per-bot/per-tick processing or risk scaling
poorly with thousands of bots?
    - - [ ] No, not at all
    - - [x] Minimal impact (**explain below**)
    - - [ ] Moderate impact (**explain below**)

There are many new triggers, multipliers, and actions, but they will be
evaluated only if the "hyjal" strategy is added. Additionally, I've
attempted to order and implement checks in a manner to limit performance
impact and have tested with .pmon active. In general, I consider
performance to be highly important so am always working on ways to limit
the impact (e.g., trying to use the most targeted grid searches
available when needed).


- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - - [ ] No
    - - [x] Yes (**explain why**)

Only in the Hyjal instance, for obvious reasons.


- Does this change add new decision branches or increase maintenance
complexity?
    - - [ ] No
    - - [x] Yes (**explain below**)

New decision branches apply only in the new Hyjal instance, for obvious
reasons. Maintenance complexity should not be increased as code outside
of the new Hyjal files is not impacted, except to the extent needed to
register and implement the strategy in the same manner as all existing
strategies. Exception: As noted, I did add new spell hooks, but if they
become problematic, they can easily be removed.


## Messages to Translate
<!--
Bot messages have to be translatable, but you don't need to do the
translations here. You only need to make sure
the message is in a translatable format, and list in the table the
message_key and the default English message.
Search for GetBotTextOrDefault in the codebase for examples.
-->
- Does this change add bot messages to translate?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**list messages in the table**)

| Message key  | Default message |
| --------------- | ------------------ |
|			 |			      |
|			 |			      |

## AI Assistance
<!--
AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
We expect contributors to be honest about what they do and do not
understand.
-->
- Was AI assistance used while working on this change?
    - - [ ] No
    - - [x] Yes (**explain below**)
<!--
If yes, please specify:
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation).
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated, and whether it
was thoroughly reviewed.
-->

Claude Sonnet 4.6 was used for more complex implementation and
occasionally GPT-5 mini was used for simple questions. I do not use AI
for brainstorming or developing strategies, only for implementation and
review of code. Most of this was written by me directly, but most
notably I needed AI support to implement the spell hooks and
triggers/actions that relied on them. Everything was reviewed and tested
many times.


## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised.
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable.
Caveat: The full impact of implementing the spell hooks on a broad scale
is beyond my knowledge to evaluate.
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained.
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed (Conf comments, WiKi commands).

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything else that's helpful to review or test your pull request.
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Keleborn <22352763+Celandriel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bash <hermensb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Revision <tkn963@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kadeshar <kadeshar@gmail.com>
2026-05-08 22:39:32 -07:00
Crow
104a1b9ee1
Clean up unnecessary includes in raid strategy and trigger-context headers (#2347)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to mod-playerbots, please make sure that
you...
1. Submit your PR to the test-staging branch, not master.
2. Read the guidelines below before submitting.
3. Don't delete parts of this template.

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: We prioritize STABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND
PREDICTABILITY over behavioral realism.

Every action and decision executes PER BOT AND PER TRIGGER. Small
increases in logic complexity scale
poorly across thousands of bots and negatively affect all. We prioritize
a stable system over a smarter
one. Bots don't need to behave perfectly; believable behavior is the
goal, not human simulation.
Default behavior must be cheap in processing; expensive behavior must be
opt-in.

Before submitting, make sure your changes aligns with these principles.
-->

## Pull Request Description
<!-- Describe what this change does and why it is needed -->
This PR trims redundant includes from raid Strategy.h and
TriggerContext.h headers. I noticed a consistent pattern of including
Multiplier.h when it was not needed in Strategy.h and including
AiObjectContext.h in TriggerContext.h when only the narrower
NamedObjectContext.h is needed (both of which I was guilty of also).
Since we make new raid strategies based on existing raid strategies, I
figure let's go for the low-hanging fruit and just fix this so we stop
doing it wrong going forward.

While I was at it, I removed other unnecessary includes but in those two
files only (across dungeon and raid strategies).

Edit: Made a couple of other minor code cleanups I'd been intending to
do. Notably, we shouldn't be including a .cpp in PlayerbotAI.cpp.

## Feature Evaluation
<!--
If your PR is very minimal (comment typo, wrong ID reference, etc), and
it is very obvious it will not have
any impact on performance, you may skip these question. If necessary, a
maintainer may ask you for them later.
-->

<!-- Please answer the following: -->
- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior.
- Describe the **processing cost** when this logic executes across many
bots.



## How to Test the Changes
<!--
- Step-by-step instructions to test the change.
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, number of bots, specific
configuration).
- Expected behavior and how to verify it.
-->



## Impact Assessment
<!-- As a generic test, before and after measure of pmon (playerbot pmon
tick) can help you here. -->
- Does this change increase per-bot/per-tick processing or risk scaling
poorly with thousands of bots?
    - - [x] No, not at all
    - - [ ] Minimal impact (**explain below**)
    - - [ ] Moderate impact (**explain below**)



- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)



- Does this change add new decision branches or increase maintenance
complexity?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)



## AI Assistance
<!--
AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
We expect contributors to be honest about what they do and do not
understand.
-->
Was AI assistance used while working on this change?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)
<!--
If yes, please specify:
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation).
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated, and whether it
was thoroughly reviewed.
-->

I had GPT-5.4 do the actual work because doing it myself file-by-file
would've been such a snoozefest.

<!--
TRANSLATIONS:
Anything new that the bots say in chat must be in a translatable format.
This is done using GetBotTextOrDefault,
which you can search for in the codebase to find examples. Your code
needs to have English as the default fallback,
while the full translations need to be in an SQL update file. The
languages in the file are the nine language
options supported by AzerothCore: English, Korean, French, German,
Chinese, Taiwanese, Spanish, Spanish Mexico, and
Russian. See
data/sql/playerbots/updates/2025_12_27_ai_playerbot_fishing_text.sql as
an example of a translation SQL
update, whose content are called within the codebase at
src/strategy/actions/FishingAction.cpp
-->

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised.
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable.
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained.
- - [x] Any new bot dialogue lines are translated.
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed (Conf comments, WiKi commands).

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything else that's helpful to review or test your pull request.
-->
2026-05-02 12:20:18 -07:00
HennyWilly
410ce134fe
Fix Deep Breath issues during Onyxia encounter (#2318)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to mod-playerbots, please make sure that
you...
1. Submit your PR to the test-staging branch, not master.
2. Read the guidelines below before submitting.
3. Don't delete parts of this template.

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: We prioritize STABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND
PREDICTABILITY over behavioral realism.

Every action and decision executes PER BOT AND PER TRIGGER. Small
increases in logic complexity scale
poorly across thousands of bots and negatively affect all. We prioritize
a stable system over a smarter
one. Bots don't need to behave perfectly; believable behavior is the
goal, not human simulation.
Default behavior must be cheap in processing; expensive behavior must be
opt-in.

Before submitting, make sure your changes aligns with these principles.
-->

## Pull Request Description
<!-- Describe what this change does and why it is needed -->
The current strategy for Onyxia causes bots to get hit by her breath
attack relatively consistently during phase 2.
The problem was that the safe zone coordinates always use the bot's
z-coordinate. If the bots are standing at the lower altitude part of the
arena, `SearchForBestPath` inside `MoveTo` causes `INVALID_HEIGHT`,
resulting in the bot not moving at all and getting hit by the breath
attack.

This PR fixes this behavior by using the actual terrain z-coordinates
for the predefined safe zones instead of always using the bot's
z-coordinate. These values are chosen to ensure valid pathfinding
regardless of the bot's current elevation.
Additionally, bots now interrupt their spells if they are not inside a
safe zone during the breath. This causes the bots to immediately start
running instead of finishing their casts first.

## Feature Evaluation
<!--
If your PR is very minimal (comment typo, wrong ID reference, etc), and
it is very obvious it will not have
any impact on performance, you may skip these question. If necessary, a
maintainer may ask you for them later.
-->

<!-- Please answer the following: -->
- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior.

Replaced the use of `bot->GetPositionZ()` in `GetSafeZonesForBreath`
with predefined safe zone z-coordinates to ensure valid pathfinding.
Added `AttackStop` and `InterruptNonMeleeSpells` to guarantee immediate
movement when outside safe zones.
No additional condition checks or branching logic were introduced.

- Describe the **processing cost** when this logic executes across many
bots.

Minimal. The logic only runs within the Onyxia encounter script and
calling `AttackStop` and `InterruptNonMeleeSpells` should be negligible.


## How to Test the Changes
<!--
- Step-by-step instructions to test the change.
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, number of bots, specific
configuration).
- Expected behavior and how to verify it.
-->
Enter Onyxia's Lair (10, 25 or 40 (mod-individual-progression)) and
engage Onyxia with the appropriate number of bots.
During phase 2 (Onyxia takes off), check if the bots move to the safe
zones during the breath attack.
Tip: Mark Onyxia as moon (RTI), so that phase 2 doesn't end too quickly.

## Impact Assessment
<!-- As a generic test, before and after measure of pmon (playerbot pmon
tick) can help you here. -->
- Does this change increase per-bot/per-tick processing or risk scaling
poorly with thousands of bots?
    - - [ ] No, not at all
    - - [x] Minimal impact (**explain below**)
    - - [ ] Moderate impact (**explain below**)

The calls of `AttackStop` and `InterruptNonMeleeSpells` cause minimal
overhead compared to the original strategy. This should be negligible.

- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - - [ ] No
    - - [x] Yes (**explain why**)

Yes (encounter-specific). Bots will now interrupt casts earlier during
Onyxia phase 2 to prioritize movement to safe zones.

- Does this change add new decision branches or increase maintenance
complexity?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

## AI Assistance
<!--
AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
We expect contributors to be honest about what they do and do not
understand.
-->
Was AI assistance used while working on this change?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)
<!--
If yes, please specify:
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation).
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated, and whether it
was thoroughly reviewed.
-->



<!--
TRANSLATIONS:
Anything new that the bots say in chat must be in a translatable format.
This is done using GetBotTextOrDefault,
which you can search for in the codebase to find examples. Your code
needs to have English as the default fallback,
while the full translations need to be in an SQL update file. The
languages in the file are the nine language
options supported by AzerothCore: English, Korean, French, German,
Chinese, Taiwanese, Spanish, Spanish Mexico, and
Russian. See
data/sql/playerbots/updates/2025_12_27_ai_playerbot_fishing_text.sql as
an example of a translation SQL
update, whose content are called within the codebase at
src/strategy/actions/FishingAction.cpp
-->

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised.
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable.
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained.
- - [x] Any new bot dialogue lines are translated.
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed (Conf comments, WiKi commands).

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything else that's helpful to review or test your pull request.
-->

The strategy for Onyxia might need additional work:
For example, the Onyxian Lair Guards are completely ignored while whelps
are alive and their Blast Nova doesn't get handled at all.
This PR focuses on fixing the Deep Breath behavior. Handling of Onyxian
Lair Guards is not included and should be implemented in a separate PR.
2026-05-02 12:19:11 -07:00
Keleborn
866a73dfbf
Clean up unused variables (#2268)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to mod-playerbots, please make sure that
you...
1. Submit your PR to the test-staging branch, not master.
2. Read the guidelines below before submitting.
3. Don't delete parts of this template.

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: We prioritize STABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND
PREDICTABILITY over behavioral realism.

Every action and decision executes PER BOT AND PER TRIGGER. Small
increases in logic complexity scale
poorly across thousands of bots and negatively affect all. We prioritize
a stable system over a smarter
one. Bots don't need to behave perfectly; believable behavior is the
goal, not human simulation.
Default behavior must be cheap in processing; expensive behavior must be
opt-in.

Before submitting, make sure your changes aligns with these principles.
-->

## Pull Request Description
<!-- Describe what this change does and why it is needed -->
Clean up a bunch of additional unused variable warnings. 


## Feature Evaluation
<!--
If your PR is very minimal (comment typo, wrong ID reference, etc), and
it is very obvious it will not have
any impact on performance, you may skip these question. If necessary, a
maintainer may ask you for them later.
-->

<!-- Please answer the following: -->
- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior.
- Describe the **processing cost** when this logic executes across many
bots.



## How to Test the Changes
<!--
- Step-by-step instructions to test the change.
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, number of bots, specific
configuration).
- Expected behavior and how to verify it.
-->



## Impact Assessment
<!-- As a generic test, before and after measure of pmon (playerbot pmon
tick) can help you here. -->
- Does this change increase per-bot/per-tick processing or risk scaling
poorly with thousands of bots?
    - - [x] No, not at all
    - - [ ] Minimal impact (**explain below**)
    - - [ ] Moderate impact (**explain below**)



- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)



- Does this change add new decision branches or increase maintenance
complexity?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)



## Messages to Translate
<!--
Bot messages have to be translatable, but you don't need to do the
translations here. You only need to make sure
the message is in a translatable format, and list in the table the
message_key and the default English message.
Search for GetBotTextOrDefault in the codebase for examples.
-->
- Does this change add bot messages to translate?
    - - [x] No
    - - [ ] Yes (**list messages in the table**)

| Message key  | Default message |
| --------------- | ------------------ |
|			 |			      |
|			 |			      |

## AI Assistance
<!--
AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
We expect contributors to be honest about what they do and do not
understand.
-->
- Was AI assistance used while working on this change?
    - - [ ] No
    - - [x] Yes (**explain below**)
<!--
If yes, please specify:
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation).
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated, and whether it
was thoroughly reviewed.
-->
Claude reviewed the warnings log from a build and suggested a series of
changes. I focused just on these warnings for now. Every line was
reviewed. Some sections need to be reviewed by author for intent.



## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised.
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable.
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained.
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed (Conf comments, WiKi commands).

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything else that's helpful to review or test your pull request.
-->
2026-04-24 23:03:36 +02:00
Crow
79562be2e5
Fix Hunter Aspect Switching + Trigger Cleanups (#2203)
# Pull Request

Note: When I reference Aspect of the Hawk below, it also means Aspect of
the Dragonhawk (the code will use Dragonhawk if the Hunter has it, Hawk
if not, they share actions, triggers, and strategies).

Hunter Aspects are currently bugged. All Hunters, regardless of spec or
strategy, are hardcoded to use Aspect of the Hawk when mana is at 70%+
and Aspect of the Viper when mana drops to "lowMana" from the config
(default is 15%), divided by 2.

This means the following:

- Hawk (bdps) and Viper (bmana) strategies are useless
- Pack (bspeed) and Wild (rnature) strategies are applied, but bots will
rapidly switch back and forth between Pack/Wild and Hawk/Viper,
depending on strategy and mana level.

This PR addresses the issues by doing the following:

- Global Hawk strategy is removed. Now you need to set bdps for Hunters
to use Hawk, but bdps remains the default Aspect strategy for all
Hunters.
- Dedicated Viper strategy is removed, leaving the global strategy.
However, Viper will be used (when lowMana/2) ONLY if the bot is set to
bdps. If the bot has the Wild or Pack strategy, they will not switch to
Viper at all. I did this because I am assuming if you are using Wild or
Pack, you need them for reasons other than to pump DPS.
- The threshold to switch back to Hawk is lowered from 70% to 60%. The
gap between lowMana/2 and 60% is now filled--if bdps is on, Hunters will
switch to Hawk whenever above the Viper threshold, _except_ for when
they have the Viper aura, in which case they will not switch to Hawk
until 60% mana. This lets the Hunter build back mana before swapping
back to Hawk (more like general player behavior) while still letting
them swap from other Aspects to Hawk without needing to be all the way
at 60% mana.
- Gets rid of a weird condition in the Hawk trigger that would make it
so that Hunters would switch to Hawk when at exactly 0 mana. I'm not
sure what the point of that is.

Also, I refactored the triggers a bit because I noticed there was some
dead code in there. I didn't do a comprehensive refactor, but there was
a lot of stuff that clearly didn't make sense even to my eyes, like
back-to-back returns. I think there's more unnecessary code even just in
the triggers, but I didn't want to get too into the weeds with this PR.

---

## Design Philosophy

We prioritize **stability, performance, and predictability** over
behavioral realism.
Complex player-mimicking logic is intentionally limited due to its
negative impact on scalability, maintainability, and
long-term robustness.

Excessive processing overhead can lead to server hiccups, increased CPU
usage, and degraded performance for all
participants. Because every action and
decision tree is executed **per bot and per trigger**, even small
increases in logic complexity can scale poorly and
negatively affect both players and
world (random) bots. Bots are not expected to behave perfectly, and
perfect simulation of human decision-making is not a
project goal. Increased behavioral
realism often introduces disproportionate cost, reduced predictability,
and significantly higher maintenance overhead.

Every additional branch of logic increases long-term responsibility. All
decision paths must be tested, validated, and
maintained continuously as the system evolves.
If advanced or AI-intensive behavior is introduced, the **default
configuration must remain the lightweight decision
model**. More complex behavior should only be
available as an **explicit opt-in option**, clearly documented as having
a measurable performance cost.

Principles:

- **Stability before intelligence**  
  A stable system is always preferred over a smarter one.

- **Performance is a shared resource**  
  Any increase in bot cost affects all players and all bots.

- **Simple logic scales better than smart logic**  
Predictable behavior under load is more valuable than perfect decisions.

- **Complexity must justify itself**  
  If a feature cannot clearly explain its cost, it should not exist.

- **Defaults must be cheap**  
  Expensive behavior must always be optional and clearly communicated.

- **Bots should look reasonable, not perfect**  
  The goal is believable behavior, not human simulation.

Before submitting, confirm that this change aligns with those
principles.

---

## Feature Evaluation

Please answer the following:

- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior?
- Describe the **cheapest implementation** that produces an acceptable
result?
- Describe the **runtime cost** when this logic executes across many
bots?

I don't expect there to be any impact on costs, and if anything this PR
removes some unneeded checks from triggers.

---

## How to Test the Changes

- Step-by-step instructions to test the change
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, bots, specific
configuration)
- Expected behavior and how to verify it

The easiest way is to go shoot a dummy with Volley until low on mana and
then toggle on selfbot. You can do this with various Aspects active to
test.

## Complexity & Impact

Does this change add new decision branches?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

Could this logic scale poorly under load?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)
---

## Defaults & Configuration

Does this change modify default bot behavior?
- - [ ] No
- - [X] Yes (**explain why**)

Described above. Default behavior is broken.

If this introduces more advanced or AI-heavy logic:
- - [X] Lightweight mode remains the default
- - [ ] More complex behavior is optional and thereby configurable
---

## AI Assistance

Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working on
this change?
- - [ ] No
- - [X] Yes (**explain below**)

I asked Claude some questions about the triggers to make sure I didn't
screw anything up.

If yes, please specify:

- AI tool or model used (e.g. ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, etc.)
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation)
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated
- Whether the result was manually reviewed and adapted

AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
Any AI-influenced changes must be verified against existing CORE and PB
logic. We expect contributors to be honest
about what they do and do not understand.

---

## Final Checklist

- - [X] Stability is not compromised
- - [X] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- - [X] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- - [X] Documentation updated if needed

---

## Notes for Reviewers

Anything that significantly improves realism at the cost of stability or
performance should be carefully discussed
before merging.

---------

Co-authored-by: Keleborn <22352763+Celandriel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bash <hermensb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Revision <tkn963@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kadeshar <kadeshar@gmail.com>
2026-04-03 13:24:37 -07:00
Crow
91eac70ca2
Implement Zul'Aman Strategies (#2186)
# Pull Request

_Implement strategies for all bosses in Zul'Aman. See next post for
overview of implemented strategies._

---

## Design Philosophy

We prioritize **stability, performance, and predictability** over
behavioral realism.
Complex player-mimicking logic is intentionally limited due to its
negative impact on scalability, maintainability, and
long-term robustness.

Excessive processing overhead can lead to server hiccups, increased CPU
usage, and degraded performance for all
participants. Because every action and
decision tree is executed **per bot and per trigger**, even small
increases in logic complexity can scale poorly and
negatively affect both players and
world (random) bots. Bots are not expected to behave perfectly, and
perfect simulation of human decision-making is not a
project goal. Increased behavioral
realism often introduces disproportionate cost, reduced predictability,
and significantly higher maintenance overhead.

Every additional branch of logic increases long-term responsibility. All
decision paths must be tested, validated, and
maintained continuously as the system evolves.
If advanced or AI-intensive behavior is introduced, the **default
configuration must remain the lightweight decision
model**. More complex behavior should only be
available as an **explicit opt-in option**, clearly documented as having
a measurable performance cost.

Principles:

- **Stability before intelligence**  
  A stable system is always preferred over a smarter one.

- **Performance is a shared resource**  
  Any increase in bot cost affects all players and all bots.

- **Simple logic scales better than smart logic**  
Predictable behavior under load is more valuable than perfect decisions.

- **Complexity must justify itself**  
  If a feature cannot clearly explain its cost, it should not exist.

- **Defaults must be cheap**  
  Expensive behavior must always be optional and clearly communicated.

- **Bots should look reasonable, not perfect**  
  The goal is believable behavior, not human simulation.

Before submitting, confirm that this change aligns with those
principles.

---

## Feature Evaluation

Please answer the following:

- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior?
- Describe the **cheapest implementation** that produces an acceptable
result?
- Describe the **runtime cost** when this logic executes across many
bots?

_I have attempted to order checks while taking into account cost and
likelihood and have opted to find lower-cost methods where possible. I
have also not gone as in depth as I have with other strategies,
partially because it is not necessary to complete encounters but also to
try to limit the performance impact. From my observation, including with
pmon, none of the methods should be overly taxing._

---

## How to Test the Changes

- Step-by-step instructions to test the change
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, bots, specific
configuration)
- Expected behavior and how to verify it

_Run Zul'Aman. See next post for strategies to test._

## Complexity & Impact

Does this change add new decision branches?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)

_Only in the context of raid strategies, with new methods to consider
and new multipliers to evaluate when bots perform actions with the
instance strategy active._

Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

_The impact is only with the "zulaman" strategy active, which will be
applied only in the instance. There is currently a PR open to also
remove instance strategies when leaving the map to get rid of the
residual performance impact._

Could this logic scale poorly under load?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain why**)

_Technically yes, but I think it is unlikely to have an appreciable
difference unless there are many groups running the instance at the same
time on a large server._

## Defaults & Configuration

Does this change modify default bot behavior?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain why**)

_Only in the instance. It is a necessary trade-off to consider with raid
strategies that I always keep in mind (degree of automation vs. player
choice)._

If this introduces more advanced or AI-heavy logic:
- - [x] Lightweight mode remains the default
- - [ ] More complex behavior is optional and thereby configurable

_Not exactly sure how to address this question in the context of this
PR, but there aren't any techniques or methods for this strategy that I
have not tried before (or something very similar)._

## AI Assistance

Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working on
this change?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)

If yes, please specify:

- AI tool or model used (e.g. ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, etc.)
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation)
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated
- Whether the result was manually reviewed and adapted

_Gemini and GPT for some questions about the codebase and C++ and
assistance with drafting a few things like containers that I find more
tedious to do myself._

AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
Any AI-influenced changes must be verified against existing CORE and PB
logic. We expect contributors to be honest
about what they do and do not understand.

---

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed

---

## Notes for Reviewers

Anything that significantly improves realism at the cost of stability or
performance should be carefully discussed
before merging.

---------

Co-authored-by: Keleborn <22352763+Celandriel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bash <hermensb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Revision <tkn963@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kadeshar <kadeshar@gmail.com>
2026-03-27 10:38:12 -07:00
kadeshar
a695ac77fa
Small fixes to naxxramas strategy (#2201)
# Pull Request

Small fixes to naxxramas strategy

---

## Complexity & Impact

Does this change add new decision branches?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

Could this logic scale poorly under load?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)
---

## Defaults & Configuration

Does this change modify default bot behavior?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

If this introduces more advanced or AI-heavy logic:
- - [x] Lightweight mode remains the default
- - [ ] More complex behavior is optional and thereby configurable
---

## AI Assistance

Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working on
this change?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

If yes, please specify:

Copilot CLI to code review

---

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed
2026-03-13 22:22:11 +01:00
Crow
dca0be2932
Updates to SSC Strategies (#2138)
# Pull Request

Most of the changes are not functional but are to modify style based on
comments received to the TK PR (e.g., eliminate nesting of if
statements) and leverage general boss helpers. There is some reordering
of returns and other changes to try to consolidate or clean-up the code
(such as removing unnecessary parameters).

The strategies themselves have only minor changes.

- Main tank no longer uses tangential movement for Lurker Spout, unlike
other bots. The MT will just call moves directly to a position behind
Lurker. This is because I found tangential movement was taking too long
for the MT to get in place since it starts right in front of Lurker.
- Vashj MT group Shaman will now use Grounding Totem without actually
switching to the Grounding Totem strategy. I have now eliminated all
strategy swaps, which I dislike because they persist after the
encounter, and it's better not to mess with player strategies since
presumably people are generally using Windfury or Wrath of Air for the
Air Totem.
- I made a ton of changes to Vashj core passing as I noticed the
existing logic is nonfunctional in several ways. It generally works fine
ingame, but the changes should make things much smoother. For example,
the storing of the nearest trigger NPC for generators in the existing
strategy is useless because it relies on insert_or_assign for an
unordered map that will continue to run during the course of the core
passing logic, and a similar issue exists with respect to the map to
store the last time a bot held a core. The result is that there is
slight movement of bots when the core is flying through the air and not
held by any bot because the trigger for core passing does not fire
during that period. In practice, the time is brief enough that the
sequence works OK, but it looks stupid because the bots should not be
moving at all. So that should be fixed.

There is a known issue re: core passing that would take extreme effort
to fix and I am not going to do it because it is a fringe situation.
There are a couple of spots where the Tainted Elemental can rarely spawn
that can result in a straight-line passing sequence to the nearest
generator that is blocked by LoS. Fixing this would be extremely
difficult and niche, so what you will need to do if this happens is to
just command your bots to destroy the core and try again with the next
spawn.

---

## Design Philosophy

We prioritize **stability, performance, and predictability** over
behavioral realism.
Complex player-mimicking logic is intentionally limited due to its
negative impact on scalability, maintainability, and
long-term robustness.

Excessive processing overhead can lead to server hiccups, increased CPU
usage, and degraded performance for all
participants. Because every action and
decision tree is executed **per bot and per trigger**, even small
increases in logic complexity can scale poorly and
negatively affect both players and
world (random) bots. Bots are not expected to behave perfectly, and
perfect simulation of human decision-making is not a
project goal. Increased behavioral
realism often introduces disproportionate cost, reduced predictability,
and significantly higher maintenance overhead.

Every additional branch of logic increases long-term responsibility. All
decision paths must be tested, validated, and
maintained continuously as the system evolves.
If advanced or AI-intensive behavior is introduced, the **default
configuration must remain the lightweight decision
model**. More complex behavior should only be
available as an **explicit opt-in option**, clearly documented as having
a measurable performance cost.

Principles:

- **Stability before intelligence**  
  A stable system is always preferred over a smarter one.

- **Performance is a shared resource**  
  Any increase in bot cost affects all players and all bots.

- **Simple logic scales better than smart logic**  
Predictable behavior under load is more valuable than perfect decisions.

- **Complexity must justify itself**  
  If a feature cannot clearly explain its cost, it should not exist.

- **Defaults must be cheap**  
  Expensive behavior must always be optional and clearly communicated.

- **Bots should look reasonable, not perfect**  
  The goal is believable behavior, not human simulation.

Before submitting, confirm that this change aligns with those
principles.

---

## Feature Evaluation

Please answer the following:

- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior?
- Describe the **cheapest implementation** that produces an acceptable
result?
- Describe the **runtime cost** when this logic executes across many
bots?

I have attempted to streamline methods and even remove some. The
strategy is admittedly somewhat performance heavy due to the need for
function calls such as iterating over inventory items. However, the new
version should be less performance intensive than the merged
strategy--for example, there were places where all members of the raid
would have their inventory checked, but I've now limited the check to
only the 5 core handler bots. I've run the instance with pmon on, and
there are no methods that stand out as particularly resource intensive
when not in a boss encounter, and I view that as the most important
thing (though I make effort to reduce performance impact during
encounters also). Expensive checks that are unavoidable for the strategy
to work such as grid searches are gated behind cheaper checks.

---

## How to Test the Changes

- Step-by-step instructions to test the change
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, bots, specific
configuration)
- Expected behavior and how to verify it

Enter SSC with a raid group and run the instance, including all bosses.
Every boss should be killable, and every major mechanic should be
addressed by bots. I will work with Dreathean to get the Wiki up soon so
that should be a reference for testing strategies.

## Complexity & Impact

Does this change add new decision branches?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)

Only within the context of strategies, which are basically all new
decision branches, and there are some tweaks here to what is currently
merged.

Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

Could this logic scale poorly under load?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain why**)

I'm sure if you have a large server, with multiple raid groups running
the instance at the same time, the performance impact could be
significant. But I have done my best to limit it, and I think some
notable performance impact is unavoidable with the current framework for
raid strategies.

---

## Defaults & Configuration

Does this change modify default bot behavior?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain why**)

Only for strategies in the instance.

If this introduces more advanced or AI-heavy logic:
- - [ ] Lightweight mode remains the default
- - [x] More complex behavior is optional and thereby configurable

There should be no impact if co +ssc and nc +ssc are not added to bots.
Because raid strategies are currently not removed after leaving an
instance, players should manually remove them (or reset botAI). This is
a general issue that needs to be addressed with the module.

---

## AI Assistance

Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working on
this change?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)

If yes, please specify:

- AI tool or model used (e.g. ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, etc.)
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation)
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated
- Whether the result was manually reviewed and adapted

AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
Any AI-influenced changes must be verified against existing CORE and PB
logic. We expect contributors to be honest
about what they do and do not understand.

GPT-4 because I don't like to use up my premium requests in CoPilot and
I generally like it better than GPT-5 =P

I use LLMs to draft code snippets but do review everything and have
become less-and-less reliant over time. I don't use agent mode, only
ask. For this PR, I had it do the updated version of
AnyRecentCoreInInventory(), which is more complicated than before and
uses indexing for each bot to consider status of only prior bots in the
passing chain. Everything else either I wrote or could have written but
had the AI help and just edited afterward to save time.

---

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed

---

## Notes for Reviewers

Anything that significantly improves realism at the cost of stability or
performance should be carefully discussed
before merging.

---------

Co-authored-by: Keleborn <22352763+Celandriel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bash <hermensb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Revision <tkn963@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kadeshar <kadeshar@gmail.com>
2026-03-13 22:21:37 +01:00
Crow
80860d72a3
Some simple improvements to Karazhan strategies (#2173)
# Pull Request

I've made a few simple changes to the Karazhan strategies that should
result in notable improvements in game.

- **Attumen**: I was using a GetExactDist2d() check for phase 2 when
bots stack behind him. That resulted in ranged bots being too close to
attack. It's now switched to the correct GetDistance2d() check to
account for the hitbox.
- **Maiden of Virtue**: The tank continuously ran side-to-side when
trying to tank her because it was trying to turn the boss with
TankFaceAction but not being able to due to being required to be within
a short distance of a set waypoint. I didn't understand the cause when I
was originally working on Karazhan. To fix this, a new multiplier
disables CombatFormationMoveAction (the "co+ disperse" strategy) and its
inherited classes, except for SetBehindTargetAction. The only other
class that inherits from CombatFormationMoveAction is TankFaceAction. I
disabled the parent class also because the ranged bots have a coded
positioning strategy and should not observe the co+ disperse strategy.
- **The Curator**: Same deal as Maiden with a new multiplier.
- **Nightbane**: Same deal as Maiden with a new multiplier.
- **Malchezaar**: Infernal avoidance for non-enfeebled bots had movement
priority set to MOVEMENT_FORCED. This was not good because it made bots
refuse to cross Hellfire so if you got unlucky, they could be stuck on
the other side of an Infernal from the boss and completely out of the
fight. MOVEMENT_FORCED needs to be reserved for situations in which the
bot absolutely cannot step in the AoE at all, and that's not the case
for non-Enfeebled bots here. Priority is now changed to MOVEMENT_COMBAT.

---

## Feature Evaluation

Please answer the following:

- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior?
- Describe the **cheapest implementation** that produces an acceptable
result?
- Describe the **runtime cost** when this logic executes across many
bots?

No additional complication in logic from these changes, and additional
performance impact is exceedingly small (just a few more multipliers
with inexpensive checks that would apply only in Karazhan).

---

## How to Test the Changes

- Step-by-step instructions to test the change
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, bots, specific
configuration)
- Expected behavior and how to verify it

Should be straightforward. Engage the above-mentioned bosses in Karazhan
and observe the mechanics. I did test all of them.

## Complexity & Impact

Does this change add new decision branches?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
- - [ ] No
- - [X] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

Barely due to the additional multipliers.

Could this logic scale poorly under load?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)
---

## Defaults & Configuration

Does this change modify default bot behavior?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

If this introduces more advanced or AI-heavy logic:
- - [X] Lightweight mode remains the default
- - [ ] More complex behavior is optional and thereby configurable
---

## AI Assistance

Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working on
this change?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

---

## Final Checklist

- - [X] Stability is not compromised
- - [X] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- - [X] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- - [X] Documentation updated if needed

---

## Notes for Reviewers

Anything that significantly improves realism at the cost of stability or
performance should be carefully discussed
before merging.

---------

Co-authored-by: Keleborn <22352763+Celandriel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bash <hermensb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Revision <tkn963@gmail.com>
2026-03-06 07:58:02 -08:00
Alex Dcnh
18bd655869
Restore Naxx Strategies without core dependencies (#2031)
### Summary
This PR restores the Naxxramas raid strategies that were removed in
commit 686fe513b25bbb20ccfcc89f08ee8c4b498a263e .
The reintroduced logic is core‑friendly (no AzerothCore script headers
or internal boss AI/EventMap dependencies), and the Naxxramas actions
have been refactored into per‑boss files for better maintainability.

### Motivation
The previous removal was meant to avoid core modifications and unblock
upstreaming.
This PR brings the strategies back while adhering to that requirement,
using only observable state and mod‑playerbots helpers.

### What’s included

- Re‑enabled the Naxxramas strategies previously removed.
- Replaced core script header dependencies with observable checks
(auras, casts, unit flags, flight state, etc.).
- Split the Naxxramas action logic into per‑boss source files to avoid a
“god file” and ease future maintenance.
- Minor, non‑intrusive behavior improvements aligned with existing
helpers.

### Future work
Some strategies may still require refinement or more advanced handling
later.
This PR focuses on restoring the baseline logic without core
dependencies, while keeping changes minimal and safe.

**Any contributions are welcome to further improve and fine‑tune the
Naxxramas strategies.**

### Testing
Tested in some Naxx boxx.
No server crash and boss killed :D

Note: I'll make another PR with revised scripts when this one are merged

---------

Co-authored-by: Keleborn <22352763+Celandriel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bash <hermensb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Revision <tkn963@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kadeshar <kadeshar@gmail.com>
2026-03-06 07:57:21 -08:00
Keleborn
439293e100
Warnings PR 2 clean unused variables (#2107)
# Pull Request

Removed unused variables and fixed styling issues. 


## How to Test the Changes

- Step-by-step instructions to test the change
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, bots, specific
configuration)
- Expected behavior and how to verify it

## Complexity & Impact

- Does this change add new decision branches?
    - [x] No
    - [] Yes (**explain below**)

- Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

- Could this logic scale poorly under load?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

---

## Defaults & Configuration

- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

If this introduces more advanced or AI-heavy logic:

- [ ] Lightweight mode remains the default
- [ ] More complex behavior is optional and thereby configurable

---

## AI Assistance

- Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working
on this change?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)


---

## Final Checklist

- [x] Stability is not compromised
- [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- [x] Documentation updated if needed

---

## Notes for Reviewers

This was filtered from the code provided by SmashingQuasar. Eliminated
variables were confirmed to be not used, but unclear at times if that is
due to mistakes in writing.

---------

Co-authored-by: bashermens <31279994+hermensbas@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-27 16:04:33 -08:00
Crow
be2cf436ea
Implement Tempest Keep: The Eye Strategies (#1943)
Edit: Descriptions of methods are out of date right now. To be updated.

This one comes with the same caveats as SSC about requiring ownership
from somebody with C++ knowledge, except I think the matter is even more
acute here because these strategies incorporate a novel approach
proposed by Timberpoes. By redeclaring the entire bossai class for
Kael’thas, it was possible to add new member functions to the class in
order to access its private member variables. This allows bots to have
visibility into boss mechanics beyond what they could do with ordinary
techniques and is similar in approach to what was done by the Naxx
strategies, except that this approach does not require any modifications
to the core. I used it for only one mechanic, which was to detect
Kael’thas’s phase. That was very helpful because the fight is divided
into 5 phases, and distinguishing between them with traditional
techniques requires lookups of a dozen NPCs and comparisons of their
various unit states, react states, and auras; by accessing his bossai,
this can all be avoided. However, there is far more potential beyond
this if the approach is an acceptable one.

On with the (shit)show.

### Trash
In a perfect world, there would be many strategies for TK trash, which
is easily more difficult than two of the bosses. It’s a real pain to do
though because to solve the biggest issues properly, each pack would
have to be handled a little differently. So the only thing I’ve included
is for Mages to cast polymorph on the Crimson Hand Centurions when they
are channeling Arcane Flurry. The purpose is not to actually keep them
CC’d but to interrupt their channel.

### Al’ar
This fight sucked so much to write a strategy for. The only silver
lining is that being the post-nerf version, the boss moves between only
4 platform locations (instead of 6), and movement between them is on a
fixed rotation (interrupted by Flame Quills) instead of being random.
Thus, a strategy can be consistently replicated, and the fight can be
done with only 3 tanks (2 on the platforms for the boss and 1 below for
adds).

**Phase 1:**
I’m going to call the platform that Al’ar lands at after the pull
“platform 0” because that reflects the indices in the code. In a
clockwise direction, the remaining platforms will be referred to as
platforms 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
The best way to pull is to first put all ranged, as well as tanks other
than your main tank and first assistant tank, on nc +stay below platform
0. Then, go up the ramp to platform 0 with your main tank, first
assistant tank, and melee dps following you, then hit Al’ar with any
ranged attack or spell to start the fight.

- Your main tank will start at platform 0, and your first assistant tank
will immediately move to platform 1. When Al’ar moves to platform 1,
your main tank will move to platform 2. When Al’ar moves to platform 2,
your first assistant tank will move to platform 3. When Al’ar moves to
platform 3, your main tank will move back to platform 0. This assures a
tank is available to receive Al’ar after every platform movement (every
30 seconds).
- Melee DPS will follow Al’ar as it moves between platforms.
- Each platform is mapped to a corresponding ground location below it.
Ranged DPS and healers will follow Al’ar by moving to the corresponding
ground location as it flies between platforms.
- After each platform move, an Ember of Al’ar will spawn. Your second
assistant tank will pick up the Ember and move it to the point that is
25 yards away from the ground position corresponding to Al’ar’s platform
(on an invisible line between such ground position and the middle of the
room). Ranged DPS will then focus down the Ember before switching back
to Al’ar (this positioning is so that ranged are not hit by the Ember
Blast explosion that happens whenever an Ember dies).
- Each time Al’ar leaves a platform, it has a chance to instead fly up
high in the middle of the room to perform Flame Quills, which will
one-shot anybody on the upper level or ramps. When Al’ar begins the
Flame Quills sequence, all bots on the top level will jump off. FYI,
Al’ar’s usage of Flame Quills is not entirely random: there is a 20%
chance for it to do so after the first platform move, and the chance
increases by another 20% after each subsequent platform move that does
not trigger Flame Quills (reset after each Flame Quills sequence).
- After Flame Quills, Al’ar will randomly land at either platform 0 or
3. To prepare for this, bots will move to assigned positions during the
Flame Quills sequence:
- Ranged and the second assistant tank will wait in the middle of the
room.
- Melee DPS will wait at a point that is between the base of each ramp.
  - The main tank will wait at the base of the ramp to platform 0.
- The first assistant tank will wait at the base of the ramp to platform
3.
- Once Al’ar lands, the regular Phase 1 strategies resume.
- When Al’ar “dies,” it disappears and moves to the center of the room,
where it casts Rebirth and returns to full HP. Bots will wait outside of
the radius of the Rebirth explosion for Phase 2 to start.

Phase 2:

- Your main tank will tank Al’ar initially. When Al’ar casts Melt Armor,
your first assistant tank will taunt Al’ar and take over. The tank swaps
will continue back and forth every time Melt Armor is cast.
- Bots will avoid Flame Patches. FWIW, the standard co +avoid aoe
strategy does work for Flame Patches, but avoid aoe provides no buffer
distance so as you’ve probably noticed, it doesn’t provide for
preemptive avoidance. Also, avoid aoe does not consider multiple hazards
together so it can be an issue when movement needs to take into account
more than one hazard, plus when a strategy requires particular bot
movement, it’s better to account for the hazards within that movement
strategy instead of relying on separate methods that can create
conflicts.
- When Al’ar takes to the sky to perform Dive Bomb, bots will spread out
(and continue to avoid Flame Patches). After the Dive Bomb, Al’ar does
another Rebirth explosion. I have tried a million different things to
properly detect this full sequence (even accessing the bossAI like I did
with Kael’thas) and cannot get it to work properly. Ultimately, all I’ve
been able to get to work at all with respect to the final explosion is
for bots to detect the 2-second cast of the Rebirth and run out. It is
not enough time for bots that are too close when the cast happens so
some bots may get hit, but if you have adequate gear, they should
survive.
- After each Dive Bomb, 2 Embers will spawn. Your second assistant tank
will tank one Ember, and either the main tank or first assistant tank,
whichever one is not tanking Al’ar at the time, will tank the other
Ember. They will both move the Embers away from bots, and ranged DPS
will focus both Embers down before switching back to Al’ar.
- Because the room is so large, it is possible for bots to get too far
away from active combat (particularly if they are thrown across the room
by Ember Blast) so there is also a method for them to run back toward
the center if they get too far away.

### Void Reaver
Ironically, what was often considered the easiest boss in 25-player
content in TBC is the only boss with an ability (Arcane Orb) that I do
not believe can be avoided by bots, even with access to Void Reaver’s
boss script. Therefore, every single Arcane Orb is going to hit its
target, so the strategy can only try to limit the damage by spreading
ranged bots in two rings around Void Reaver (one for healers and one for
ranged DPS, to try to ensure sufficient distribution of healers). The
tanks will all fight for aggro (necessary due to Knock Away) and try to
keep Void Reaver in the middle of the room. Bots that can wipe aggro or
otherwise gain invulnerability are directed to use the applicable
abilities as soon as they pick up aggro (e.g., Soulshatter). He’s still
easy, but if you have IP nerfs, it’s a little bit of a gear check.

### High Astromancer Solarian
No boss was hit harder by nerfs in TBC than Solarian, whose encounter
went from a totally unique fight that required arcane resistance to a
fight that is kind of just an easier Baron Geddon. IMO, she is the
easiest boss in TBC 25-player raids.

- Ranged bots stack up at a distance from Solarian; this leaves all bots
with plenty of space to run away from other bots when they get Wrath of
the Astromancer.
- When Solarian vanishes, all bots will stack to AoE down the Solarium
Agents that spawn.
- When Solarian returns with two Solarium Priests, melee will divide
into two groups, with one focused on each Solarium Priest. I think this
method is not working correctly right now because when one Priest dies,
the bots still on the second Priest are leaving it. I’ll need to decide
whether I want to figure it out or just get rid of it because this fight
is so easy regardless.
- Priest bots will cast Fear Ward on the main tank to block the Psychic
Scream during the final tank-and-spank Voidwalker phase, and the main
tank will pick up Voidwalker Solarian as soon as she transforms.

Note that the bots will not be knocked into the air by Wrath of the
Astromancer. The issue is due to the presence of a check for knockbacks
in Playerbots that causes bots to ignore knockbacks that would launch
them at a velocity beyond a hardcoded value. I’ve increased that
velocity limit on my own fork, and it does allow Wrath of the
Astromancer (and other knockbacks that otherwise don’t work) to work on
bots. But that’s obviously a broader issue and not addressed in this PR,
and bots don’t take fall damage in any case.

### Kael’thas Sunstrider

So this strategy has 23(!) action methods. But like in retail, this is
actually an easy fight once it is learned because it is highly scripted.

Unlike in other strategies I’ve done, the bots probably cannot do this
fight by themselves unless they are way overgeared. This is because
there are a few windows during which bots need to position themselves
properly based on dynamic factors. But no RTSC is needed—you just need
to have bots follow you to the right locations. Also note that the gear
check for this strategy is higher than in retail because you have to get
all of the legendary weapons down and looted before the advisors aggro
in Phase 3, or it’s going to be an absolute shitshow (with human
players, you can deal with there still being a couple of weapons up).
For a point of reference, when I was first working on this strategy with
damage reduced to 50% and bots pretty close to T4 BiS, I had almost no
margin of error (I would usually get the weapons down with barely a
second to spare).

You will need at least 2 tanks, but 3 is better. Your main tank will
need to be able to equip the legendary shield so you must use a Warrior
or Paladin. However, it is ideal for the first assistant tank to be a
Druid because they can equip the legendary staff.

**Phase 1:**
Fun fact—when you “kill” the advisors in this phase, they don’t actually
die but get an aura applied called “Permanent Feign Death” (nice
oxymoron).

- _Thaladred_: You’re supposed to kite him, and bots can’t really kite,
so the method is a poor man’s method of having the bot move away from
him in a straight line when fixated. You want him to die in the far
Southern part of the room. If he dies in a bad location, you may as well
call a wipe and restart. What will work best for you will depend on your
DPS since you don’t want to kill him before he gets to the location you
want but also don’t want bots to be trapped up against a wall since they
can’t properly kite him. The way that works best for me is to have bots
stay back while I aggro the boss, and wait until right before Thaladred
switches to his second fixate target before attacking. Note that if you
do put bots on stay, when you put them back on follow, the bot that is
then being fixated will remain on stay (because they need to disregard
movement orders other than running away from Thaladred). So after
Thaladred dies, make sure to manually type /follow or the bot that was
fixated when you took the bots off of stay will not rejoin the fight.
- _Sanguinar_: He will be tanked by your main tank, who will be targeted
by your Priests for Fear Ward. Bots will wait to engage him; I made it a
very generous time (12 seconds) because there is absolutely no rush in
Phase 1. There’s no sense in being aggressive. During that time, the
main tank will drag Sanguinar to the West wall.
- _Capernian_: This is the first make-or-break part of the fight. Phase
1 Capernian was the most frequent cause for wipes for me.
- She should be tanked by a Warlock. If you want to pick your Warlock
tank, you can do so by the assistant flag, but if you don’t, the
strategy will just pick your highest HP Warlock. If you raid without a
Warlock, then you’re insane, but at least there’s a guard so your server
won’t crash?
- You do not need to add the tank strategy to your Warlock. There is a
method that will automatically switch your selected tank Warlock between
DPS and tank strategies at appropriate times because you need to squeeze
out every drop of DPS you can get, particularly for Phase 2, where
you’ll need your Warlock to be blowing up weapons with Seed of
Corruption instead of spamming Searing Pain. You’ll want your Warlock to
start with a DPS strategy as usual (since they should be DPSing
Thaladred).
- To engage Capernian, start running East right before Sanguinar dies.
She will activate quickly, and you want to try to get in front of her
(but not too close) before she aggros.
- When Capernian aggros, your Warlock tank will immediately switch to
the tank strategy and attack. Your main tank will run toward Capernian
but not actually attack; their purpose will be to bait her Conflagration
to reduce the chance that it hits your Warlock tank. Other melee will
not engage Capernian. Ranged DPS will be idle for 12 seconds; during
this time, you should run South to make sure they are not in range of
Capernian. After 12 seconds, your ranged DPS will activate, move into
range and spread out, and attack (it doesn’t seem possible to outrange
Conflagrate, so if bots don’t spread, she will annihilate the entire
ranged group with a single cast). Ideally, you kill her not too far from
her starting position. If she ends up in the middle of the room, you
should probably wipe and start over.
- _Telonicus_: He is very easy in retail but actually is a big risk for
wipes with respect to bots because his bombs will one-shot any non-tank,
and bots will stupidly stand in front of him without a proper strategy.
You should keep some distance from him before he aggros. Your first
assistant tank will pick him up and move him to the West wall near
Sanguinar. Again, there is a 12-second delay before DPS starts. Your
melee DPS are coded to stay directly behind him and not get too close so
they don’t get hit by bombs.

**Phase 2:**
Kael’thas will summon all weapons immediately after Telonicus is down.
Just before Telonicus is down, you should move to the platform where the
advisors originally were—you’ll be in better position for the raid to
AoE down the weapons.

- Your main tank will pick up the axe and move it away from the group.
The axe is the biggest threat during this phase and can easily one-shot
casters if not pulled away.
- One of your Hunters will attempt to get aggro on the bow and move away
from the group (as a hacky way of trying to turn the bow away from the
group because you can’t really get a bot to do that directly). This
method is hit or miss, but it shouldn’t be that big of a deal if your
Hunter doesn’t pull it off properly.
- Everybody else will prioritize weapons in the following order (but
most damage will come from AoE, which is what you want or you will not
beat the timer): staff, mace, sword, dagger, axe (ranged only), bow, and
shield.
- As weapons are defeated, bots will loot and equip them. If you have
not disabled bot announcements in your config, you get to see your
entire raid go nuts because they looted legendary items.
- Here is what weapons bots will loot and equip. I don't know anything
about DKs, having never played WotLK, so tell me if anything is wrong
for them.
- _Healers:_ Mace (if a healer normally uses a staff, it's best if they
keep an OH in their bags for this fight)
- _Tanks:_ Shield and sword for Paladins and DK, shield and dagger for
warriors, staff for Druid
  - _Offensive_ casters: Staff
- _Rogues:_ Sword and dagger if Combat or Subtlety, dagger only if
Assassination
  - _DPS Death Knights, Retribution Paladins, Arms Warriors_: Axe
- _Fury Warriors_: Dagger. I understand that due to Titan Grip, they
should also have the Axe for best DPS; however, Fury Warriors have awful
DPS (we’re talking barely above Prot-level) at this stage. Thus, my view
is it is better to give them only the dagger so they will MH it and help
break MC in Phase 4, since they will contribute hardly any DPS
regardless.
  - _Cat Druids_: Staff
  - _Enhancement Shamans_: Dagger
- _Hunters:_ Bow and dagger. Note that I do NOT have them loot the sword
because they need the dagger in their mainhand to use to break MC in
Phase 4; whatever marginal benefit they get from the sword as a stat
stick is not worth losing this capability. If your Hunter uses a 2H, it
is best to have them carry a 1H in their inventory so they can put
something in the OH after they equip the dagger.
- After looting weapons, bots with the staff will use it (once) to
activate the Mental Protection Field. Hunters will use the bow to
generate the legendary arrows and equip those (and will continue to do
so during the fight if they use up the arrows).
- If you wipe from this point forward, everybody will lose their
legendary weapons, and by default, most bots will not automatically
reequip their own weapons until a loot event occurs. This was extremely
annoying, and therefore there is a noncombat method implemented that
causes everybody to equip upgrades when they get within 150 yards of
Kael’thas. I considered applying this to the whole instance, but I’m not
sure if some people would not like that so I decided to limit things to
the Kael’thas encounter.

**Phase 3:**
I highly recommend you have your Shamans drop Tremor Totems (co +tremor)
during this phase. Doing so is not coded because I wanted to leave
flexibility, but I think it is very helpful for Sanguinar. After the
weapons die, you want to move your bots to a central location between
the advisors. If Thaladred died closer to the middle of the room,
ideally you position to the side of Thaladred so when he fixates he will
not chase bots North into the other advisors.

- Shamans will immediately use Heroism/Bloodlust.
- Your melee tanks will bring Sanguinar and Telonicus to their tanking
positions (same as Phase 1). If your first assistant tank is a Druid,
they will be immune to Telonicus’s Remote Toy due to having the
legendary staff’s aura activated and will also make your main tank
immune.
- One healer will stay by the Sanguinar and Telonicus tanking positions
to heal the tanks. Once IsHealAssistantOfIndex() is fixed, you will be
able to select this healer with the assistant flag. Right now, this will
just be the last healer that joined your raid (per standard AC logic).
- DPS priority will be Thaladred, Capernian (ranged only), Sanguinar,
Telonicus. As with retail, the most chaotic period will be before
Thaladred is killed, particularly if he chases bots into other advisors.
I don’t have a great solution for this, but Capernian is significantly
less dangerous during this phase thanks to the legendary staff. This is
the last true breakpoint—if you get Thaladred down with your raid mostly
intact, you are very likely to get the kill.

**Phase 4:**
Kael’thas will aggro immediately after all advisors are dead.

- Your main tank will position Kael’thas at his original position.
- Bots will move out of Flame Strikes.
- Assist tanks will pick up Phoenixes. Since they die over time anyway,
bots will not waste time attacking them. When Phoenixes die, they turn
into an Egg—at that point, bots will switch to the Egg to destroy it
before the Phoenix is reborn.
- When Kael’thas puts up Shock Barrier and starts casting Pyroblast on
your main tank (a one-shot), all bots will focus DPS on him (even if
there is an egg up). You have 4 seconds to break the barrier (80K HP)
and interrupt his Pyroblast. It is likely that you will not be able to
if you are playing with IP nerfs and are in T4 gear. However, the main
tank will use the legendary shield’s ability, which will allow them to
absorb one cast, giving you 8 seconds to break the barrier and interrupt
Pyroblast. Bots will put top priority on interrupting Pyroblast as soon
as the barrier is down.
- If a bot (or player) is mind controlled, bots with the legendary
dagger (other than tanks) will move to MC’d players and use the
following attacks to break MC: Shiv (Rogues), Hamstring (Warriors), Wing
Clip (Hunters), and Stormstrike (Shamans).

**Phase 5:**
At 50% HP, Kael’thas enters a long RP sequence. This is a good time to
kill any remaining Phoenixes and/or Eggs.
- Kael’thas stops casting Pyroblast and Mind Control.
- His main new ability is Gravity Lapse, and it doesn’t work properly on
bots... He sucks in the entire raid then knocks everybody back in a
different direction. What is supposed to happen is that players will end
up floating in midair in different directions and at different heights.
However, bots will immediately fall to the ground after getting knocked
back. They will not actually hit the ground though and instead remain in
a flying state right above the floor.
- If you could move in 3D space, Netherbeam would be very easy to deal
with. However, because that is not available to bots, they can spread
only in 2D space and thus need to move farther to get properly spread,
and they waste the first moments falling straight down. As a result, the
damage from Netherbeam can be quite high, and the beginning of Gravity
Lapse requires a lot of healing. I don’t really have a better way of
dealing with this.
- FWIW, I don’t think there is any existing method to make bots disperse
in 3D anyway.
- Kael’thas is supposed to use Nether Void when players are in midair,
which creates clouds that reduce your max HP and thus make it more
challenging to maneuver, but AC is bugged and he doesn’t use the ability
at all (there’s been an open issue about this forever).

For fuck's sake, that's all.

---------

Co-authored-by: Keleborn <22352763+Celandriel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bash <hermensb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Revision <tkn963@gmail.com>
2026-02-27 16:04:10 -08:00
Alex Dcnh
1f3d11d1c4
Stage2 refactor switch custom calculations by core helpers clean (#2127)
# Pull Request

This change replaces a few manual distance calculations in
`WorldPosition` with AzerothCore distance helpers. The goal is to reduce
duplicated math, keep behavior consistent with core utilities, and avoid
reimplementing logic that already exists in the core.

---

## Design Philosophy

We prioritize **stability, performance, and predictability** over
behavioral realism.
Complex player-mimicking logic is intentionally limited due to its
negative impact on scalability, maintainability, and
long-term robustness.

Excessive processing overhead can lead to server hiccups, increased CPU
usage, and degraded performance for all
participants. Because every action and
decision tree is executed **per bot and per trigger**, even small
increases in logic complexity can scale poorly and
negatively affect both players and
world (random) bots. Bots are not expected to behave perfectly, and
perfect simulation of human decision-making is not a
project goal. Increased behavioral
realism often introduces disproportionate cost, reduced predictability,
and significantly higher maintenance overhead.

Every additional branch of logic increases long-term responsibility. All
decision paths must be tested, validated, and
maintained continuously as the system evolves.
If advanced or AI-intensive behavior is introduced, the **default
configuration must remain the lightweight decision
model**. More complex behavior should only be
available as an **explicit opt-in option**, clearly documented as having
a measurable performance cost.

Principles:

- **Stability before intelligence**  
  A stable system is always preferred over a smarter one.

- **Performance is a shared resource**  
  Any increase in bot cost affects all players and all bots.

- **Simple logic scales better than smart logic**  
Predictable behavior under load is more valuable than perfect decisions.

- **Complexity must justify itself**  
  If a feature cannot clearly explain its cost, it should not exist.

- **Defaults must be cheap**  
  Expensive behavior must always be optional and clearly communicated.

- **Bots should look reasonable, not perfect**  
  The goal is believable behavior, not human simulation.

Before submitting, confirm that this change aligns with those
principles.

---

## Feature Evaluation

Please answer the following:

- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior?
Use existing core distance helpers instead of manual math, keeping the
logic localized to `WorldPosition`.
- Describe the **cheapest implementation** that produces an acceptable
result?
Directly call `GetExactDist`, `GetExactDist2d`, and `GetExactDist2dSq`
where appropriate.
- Describe the **runtime cost** when this logic executes across many
bots?
No additional cost; the helper calls replace equivalent math and avoid
extra intermediate objects.

---

## How to Test the Changes

- Step-by-step instructions to test the change
- Build the module and run existing bot scenarios that rely on
`WorldPosition` distance checks.
  - Verify no behavioral regressions in travel-related logic.
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, bots, specific
configuration)
  - Standard server + mod-playerbots setup.
- Expected behavior and how to verify it
- Distances computed in travel logic remain identical; no gameplay
change expected.

## Complexity & Impact

Does this change add new decision branches?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

Could this logic scale poorly under load?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)
---

## Defaults & Configuration

Does this change modify default bot behavior?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

If this introduces more advanced or AI-heavy logic:
- - [x] Lightweight mode remains the default
- - [x] More complex behavior is optional and thereby configurable
---

## AI Assistance

Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working on
this change?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

---

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- - [ ] Documentation updated if needed

---

## Notes for Reviewers

This is a localized refactor that replaces manual distance math with
core helpers for consistency and maintainability.
No behavioral change is expected.

---------

Co-authored-by: Keleborn <22352763+Celandriel@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-23 13:19:56 -08:00
Keleborn
441f9f7552
Warnings PR 1: Event warnings and headers (#2106)
# Pull Request

This is the first in a series of PRs intended to eliminate warnings in
the module. The design intent is to eliminate the calling event when not
needed in the body of the function. Based off of SmashingQuasars work.

---

## How to Test the Changes

- Step-by-step instructions to test the change
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, bots, specific
configuration)
- Expected behavior and how to verify it

## Complexity & Impact

- Does this change add new decision branches?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

- Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

- Could this logic scale poorly under load?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

---

## Defaults & Configuration

- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

If this introduces more advanced or AI-heavy logic:

- [ ] Lightweight mode remains the default
- [ ] More complex behavior is optional and thereby configurable

---

## AI Assistance

- Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working
on this change?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

---

## Final Checklist

- [x] Stability is not compromised
- [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- [x] Documentation updated if needed

---

## Notes for Reviewers

Anything that significantly improves realism at the cost of stability or
performance should be carefully discussed
before merging.

---------

Co-authored-by: bashermens <31279994+hermensbas@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-14 20:55:10 +01:00
Crow
9748e36ad6
Fix potential failure of Magtheridon cube clickers to engage in combat (#2129)
# Pull Request

I noticed a problem that has always existed with the Magtheridon
strategy but just never came up for me due to chance. Cube clicker logic
is based on a timer that resets after every Blast Nova. If the timer is
not reset, the cubes will still be clicked, but the clickers will do
nothing but wait to click on the cubes instead of resuming combat
between Blast Novas. Because tracking of the Blast Nova state happens
during the cube clicking sequence, if a cube clicker is assigned the
singular role to track Blast Nova state (which is done simply by
returning the first DPS bot found), then the timer will not be reset.

This whole strategy needs a refactor, but the simple fix for this
problem for now is just to remove the role check for tracking the Blast
Nova state. I tested the fix, and it works.

---

## Design Philosophy

We prioritize **stability, performance, and predictability** over
behavioral realism.
Complex player-mimicking logic is intentionally limited due to its
negative impact on scalability, maintainability, and
long-term robustness.

Excessive processing overhead can lead to server hiccups, increased CPU
usage, and degraded performance for all
participants. Because every action and
decision tree is executed **per bot and per trigger**, even small
increases in logic complexity can scale poorly and
negatively affect both players and
world (random) bots. Bots are not expected to behave perfectly, and
perfect simulation of human decision-making is not a
project goal. Increased behavioral
realism often introduces disproportionate cost, reduced predictability,
and significantly higher maintenance overhead.

Every additional branch of logic increases long-term responsibility. All
decision paths must be tested, validated, and
maintained continuously as the system evolves.
If advanced or AI-intensive behavior is introduced, the **default
configuration must remain the lightweight decision
model**. More complex behavior should only be
available as an **explicit opt-in option**, clearly documented as having
a measurable performance cost.

Principles:

- **Stability before intelligence**  
  A stable system is always preferred over a smarter one.

- **Performance is a shared resource**  
  Any increase in bot cost affects all players and all bots.

- **Simple logic scales better than smart logic**  
Predictable behavior under load is more valuable than perfect decisions.

- **Complexity must justify itself**  
  If a feature cannot clearly explain its cost, it should not exist.

- **Defaults must be cheap**  
  Expensive behavior must always be optional and clearly communicated.

- **Bots should look reasonable, not perfect**  
  The goal is believable behavior, not human simulation.

Before submitting, confirm that this change aligns with those
principles.

---

## Feature Evaluation

Please answer the following:

- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior?
- Describe the **cheapest implementation** that produces an acceptable
result?
- Describe the **runtime cost** when this logic executes across many
bots?

---

## How to Test the Changes

- Step-by-step instructions to test the change
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, bots, specific
configuration)
- Expected behavior and how to verify it

## Complexity & Impact

Does this change add new decision branches?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

Could this logic scale poorly under load?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)
---

## Defaults & Configuration

Does this change modify default bot behavior?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

If this introduces more advanced or AI-heavy logic:
- - [ ] Lightweight mode remains the default
- - [ ] More complex behavior is optional and thereby configurable
---

## AI Assistance

Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working on
this change?
- - [X] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

If yes, please specify:

- AI tool or model used (e.g. ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, etc.)
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation)
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated
- Whether the result was manually reviewed and adapted

AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
Any AI-influenced changes must be verified against existing CORE and PB
logic. We expect contributors to be honest
about what they do and do not understand.

---

## Final Checklist

- - [ ] Stability is not compromised
- - [ ] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- - [ ] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- - [ ] Documentation updated if needed

---

## Notes for Reviewers

Anything that significantly improves realism at the cost of stability or
performance should be carefully discussed
before merging.
2026-02-13 09:25:12 -08:00
Alex Dcnh
17b8d7f68b
Stage1 refactor world position method names (#2126)
# Pull Request

This change replaces the non‑standard
WorldPosition::getX/getY/getZ/getO/getMapId wrappers with the core
getters (GetPositionX/Y/Z, GetOrientation, GetMapId) and removes the
redundant wrappers.
Goal: align the module with AzerothCore conventions, reduce local
adapters, and improve long‑term maintainability.

---

## Design Philosophy

This is a structural cleanup only (coordinate access) and does not alter
any AI behavior or decision logic.
It follows the stability/performance-first philosophy and does not add
branches or extra runtime work.

Before submitting: yes, this change aligns with the principles of
stability, performance, and predictability.

Principles:

- **Stability before intelligence**  
  A stable system is always preferred over a smarter one.

- **Performance is a shared resource**  
  Any increase in bot cost affects all players and all bots.

- **Simple logic scales better than smart logic**  
Predictable behavior under load is more valuable than perfect decisions.

- **Complexity must justify itself**  
  If a feature cannot clearly explain its cost, it should not exist.

- **Defaults must be cheap**  
  Expensive behavior must always be optional and clearly communicated.

- **Bots should look reasonable, not perfect**  
  The goal is believable behavior, not human simulation.

Before submitting, confirm that this change aligns with those
principles.

---

## Feature Evaluation

Please answer the following:

- Minimum logic required: use core getters (GetPositionX/Y/Z, GetMapId,
GetOrientation) wherever coordinates are needed.
- Cheapest implementation: direct call replacement and removal of
redundant wrappers.
- Runtime cost: negligible (same data access, no additional logic).

---

## How to Test the Changes

- No functional testing required (behavior‑neutral refactor).
- Recommended: compile the module and run a normal server startup as
validation.

## Complexity & Impact

Does this change add new decision branches?
- - [x] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)

Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

Could this logic scale poorly under load?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)
---

## Defaults & Configuration

Does this change modify default bot behavior?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

If this introduces more advanced or AI-heavy logic:
- - [x] Lightweight mode remains the default
- - [x] More complex behavior is optional and thereby configurable
---

## AI Assistance

Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working on
this change?
- - [ ] No
- - [x] Yes (**explain below**)

If yes, please specify:

- AI tool or model used: Copilot
- Purpose of usage: Translate this PR text from french to English

---

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed

---

## Notes for Reviewers

This is a core-friendly cleanup only, with no behavioral change.
No additional logic or CPU cost is introduced.
2026-02-13 09:24:42 -08:00
privatecore
a0a50204ec
Fix action validation checks: isUseful -> isPossible + codestyle fixes and corrections (#2125)
# Pull Request

Fix the incorrect logic flaw when processing actions from different
sources. It should be: `isUseful` -> `isPossible`. The original logic is
based on the Mangosbot code and the impl presented inside
`Engine::DoNextAction`. This should fix all wrong validation orders for
triggers and direct/specific actions.

Code style is based on the AzerothCore style guide + clang-format.

---

## Design Philosophy

We prioritize **stability, performance, and predictability** over
behavioral realism.
Complex player-mimicking logic is intentionally limited due to its
negative impact on scalability, maintainability, and
long-term robustness.

Excessive processing overhead can lead to server hiccups, increased CPU
usage, and degraded performance for all
participants. Because every action and
decision tree is executed **per bot and per trigger**, even small
increases in logic complexity can scale poorly and
negatively affect both players and
world (random) bots. Bots are not expected to behave perfectly, and
perfect simulation of human decision-making is not a
project goal. Increased behavioral
realism often introduces disproportionate cost, reduced predictability,
and significantly higher maintenance overhead.

Every additional branch of logic increases long-term responsibility. All
decision paths must be tested, validated, and
maintained continuously as the system evolves.
If advanced or AI-intensive behavior is introduced, the **default
configuration must remain the lightweight decision
model**. More complex behavior should only be
available as an **explicit opt-in option**, clearly documented as having
a measurable performance cost.

Principles:

- **Stability before intelligence**  
  A stable system is always preferred over a smarter one.

- **Performance is a shared resource**  
  Any increase in bot cost affects all players and all bots.

- **Simple logic scales better than smart logic**  
Predictable behavior under load is more valuable than perfect decisions.

- **Complexity must justify itself**  
  If a feature cannot clearly explain its cost, it should not exist.

- **Defaults must be cheap**  
  Expensive behavior must always be optional and clearly communicated.

- **Bots should look reasonable, not perfect**  
  The goal is believable behavior, not human simulation.

Before submitting, confirm that this change aligns with those
principles.

---

## Feature Evaluation

Please answer the following:

- Describe the **minimum logic** required to achieve the intended
behavior?
- Describe the **cheapest implementation** that produces an acceptable
result?
- Describe the **runtime cost** when this logic executes across many
bots?

---

## How to Test the Changes

- Step-by-step instructions to test the change
- Any required setup (e.g. multiple players, bots, specific
configuration)
- Expected behavior and how to verify it

## Complexity & Impact

Does this change add new decision branches?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

Could this logic scale poorly under load?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)
---

## Defaults & Configuration

Does this change modify default bot behavior?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

If this introduces more advanced or AI-heavy logic:
- - [ ] Lightweight mode remains the default
- - [ ] More complex behavior is optional and thereby configurable
---

## AI Assistance

Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working on
this change?
- - [x] No
- - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

If yes, please specify:

- AI tool or model used (e.g. ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, etc.)
- Purpose of usage (e.g. brainstorming, refactoring, documentation, code
generation)
- Which parts of the change were influenced or generated
- Whether the result was manually reviewed and adapted

AI assistance is allowed, but all submitted code must be fully
understood, reviewed, and owned by the contributor.
Any AI-influenced changes must be verified against existing CORE and PB
logic. We expect contributors to be honest
about what they do and do not understand.

---

## Final Checklist

- - [x] Stability is not compromised
- - [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- - [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- - [x] Documentation updated if needed

---

## Notes for Reviewers

Anything that significantly improves realism at the cost of stability or
performance should be carefully discussed
before merging.
2026-02-13 09:24:11 -08:00
Crow
8585f10f48
Implement Serpentshrine Cavern Strategies (#1888)
Edited: Below description of methods were brought up to date as of the
PR coming off of draft.

### General
I've starting leveraging, to the extent possible, an out-of-combat
method to erase map keys. This is mostly useful for timers that need to
start upon the pull because I dislike having to rely on a check for a
boss to be at 100% HP (or 99.9% or whatever) because it can be
unreliable sometimes.

### Trash
Underbog Colossi: Some Colossi leave behind a lake of toxin when they
die that quickly kills any player that is standing in it. The pool is a
dynamic-object-generated AoE, and bots will not avoid it on their own (I
think because the AoE is out of combat, plus the radius is much larger
than the default avoidance radius in the config). The method does not
require bots to be in combat, and simply gets bots to run out of the
toxin. You will probably still get a couple of idiots who drink in the
middle of it, but in my experience, the vast majority of the raid gets
out, and healers that escape can easily keep up a couple of fools until
they've drank to full.

Greyheart Tidecallers: Bots will mark and destroy Water Elemental Totems
immediately.

### Hydross the Unstable
The strategy uses 2 tanks, with the main tank assigned to the frost
phase and the 1st assistant tank assigned to the nature phase.

- The main tank will tank the frost phase, and the first assistant tank
will tank the nature phase. They each have designated spots and will
wait at their spots twiddling their thumbs while Hydross is in the other
phase.
- Hunters will misdirect to the applicable tank upon the pull and after
each phase change.
- The phase change process begins 1 second after Hydross reaches 100%
Marks. The current tank will begin moving to the next phase tank's spot
for the next tank to take over as soon as Hydross transitions.
- DPS is ordered to stop after Hydross reaches 100% Marks until 5
seconds after he transitions.
- Bots will prioritize the elementals adds after every phase change,
unless Hydross is under 10% HP, in which case they should ignore the
adds and burn the boss.
- Ranged bots should spread during the frost phase to mitigate the
impact of Water Tombs.

### The Lurker Below

- There is a designated spot for the main tank.
- Ranged DPS will fan out over a 120-degree arc that is centered
directly across from the tank spot (to try to spread to reduce Geyser
damage while also keeping them behind Lurker).
- When Spout begins, all bots will run around behind Lurker. The intent
is to keep a distance with a radius of 20 or 21 yards and within 45
degrees (either side) of directly behind him. Movement is specifically
tangential along an arc so bots don't run in front of Lurker.
- Spout's duration is tracked by a timer. The mechanics of the spell
itself are rather unique and don't involve a continuous cast or aura to
track easily so I settled for the timer.
- If you have 3 (or more) tanks, each of the first 3 tanks will be
assigned to one of the 3 Coilfang Guardians during the submerge phase.

### Leotheras the Blind
The fight is designed for a Warlock tank. You can choose the Warlock
tank by giving a Warlock the Assistant flag. If you don't do that, your
highest HP Warlock will be picked. Do NOT switch the Warlock tank to a
co +tank strategy--the designated Warlock is hardcoded to spam Searing
Pain on Demon Leo and otherwise will engage in normal DPS strategies. If
you don't have a Warlock at all, the strategy has some methods built in
to try to make things work as best as possible with a melee tank.

- The Spellbinders get marked with skulls and killed in order.
- There is no designated spot or designated tank for the human phase.
Your tanks will fight for aggro. Ranged bots will attempt to keep some
distance, and when Whirlwind starts, everybody will run away from
Leotheras.
- During the demon phase, your melee tanks should take a backseat to
your Warlock tank, who will receive help in the form of Misdirection.
Bots will get the hell away from the Warlock tank so the Warlock tank
should be taking every Chaos Blast alone.
- During the final phase, your regular tanks will tank Leotheras, and
the Warlock tank will tank his Shadow. The melee tanks will attempt to
separate Leotheras from his Shadow so bots can focus down Leotheras
without getting hit with Chaos Blasts.
- Bots will wait 5 seconds to DPS after every transition into human
phase, 12 seconds to DPS after every transition into demon phase, and 8
seconds to DPS after the transition into the final phase. There is no
waiting on DPS after Whirlwinds, even though it would be ideal. It's not
a big deal to live without, and for various reasons, it would have been
a pain in the ass to deal with.
- Bots will save Bloodlust/Heroism until after Spellbinders are down.
- To deal with the Inner Demons, I disabled DPS assist for bots who are
targeted and force them to focus only on their Inner Demons. This is
sufficient in my experience for all DPS bots and Protection Warriors and
Paladins to kill their Inner Demons, even at 50% damage. Feral Tank
Druids and Healers still need help, so the strategy hardcodes their
actions while fighting Inner Demons. For example, Resto Druids are coded
to shift out of Tree Form, cast Barkskin on themselves, and just spam
Wrath until the Inner Demon is dead. There are no bot strategy changes
used for this method.

### Fathom-Lord Karathress
You will need 4 tanks. Your main tank will tank Karathress, and an
assistant tank will tank each Fathom Guard. If you have fewer than 4
tanks, then the priority order for tank assignment will be Karathress,
Caribdis, Sharkkis, and then Tidalvess.

- Roughly, the tank spots are (1) for Karathress, near where he starts
but closer to the ledge for LoS reasons, (2) for Sharkkis, North from
his starting location on the other side of the ramp, (3) for Tidalvess,
Northwest from his starting location near the pillar, and (4) for
Caribdis, far to the West of her starting position, near the corner.
- Note that the tanks will probably clip through the terrain a bit when
going to their positions. This is due to me implementing a forced MoveTo
to the tank position coordinates. There is something weird about the
maps in Karathress's room, and the tanks will take some really screwed
up paths without making them go directly to the exact coordinates. So
this looks stupid but is necessary.
- One healer will be assigned to heal the Caribdis tank. Because AC
Playerbots does not yet have a focus heal strategy, this just means that
such healer has a designated location near the Caribdis tank's location.
This healer can be selected with the Assistant flag.
- Hunters will misdirect the Fathom Guards onto their applicable tanks.
If you don't have three Hunters, the priority is Caribdis, Tidalvess,
then Sharkkis.
- DPS will wait 12 seconds to begin attacking. After that, they will
prioritize targets as follows:
- (1): Melee will always prioritize Spitfire Totems as soon as they
spawn. This will continue through the duration of the fight.
- (2): All bots will kill Tidalvess first.
- (3): Melee bots will move to Sharkkis, and ranged bots will move to
Caribdis. I understand this is not the standard kill order for players,
which would have the entire raid kill Sharkkis next. The reasons I have
done this differently are because melee DPS is much stronger with 3.3.5
talents vs. in retail TBC, and because bots get really thrown off by
Cyclones and therefore they struggle to kill Caribdis quickly. You do
not want Karathress below 75% HP before all Fathom-Guards are dead or he
gets a huge damage buff.
- (4) If Caribdis dies first, ranged bots will help with Sharkkis.
- (5) Everybody kills Sharkkis's pet.
- (6) Everybody kills Karathress.

### Morogrim Tidewalker

- The main tank will pull the boss to the Northeast pillar, with the
tank's back against the pillar.
- A hunter will misdirect the boss onto the main tank upon the pull.
- When the boss gets to 26% HP, the main tank will begin moving the boss
to the Northeast corner of the room in preparation for Phase 2 (which
begins at 25%). The tank will move in two steps to get around the
pillar.
- When the boss gets to 25% HP, ranged will follow the main tank to the
corner and stack up right behind the boss. They will also move in two
steps.
- There is no method for melee since they will just naturally follow the
boss anyway.

### Lady Vashj

**Phase 1**:
- The main tank will tank Vashj in the center of the arena.
- If a Shaman is in the main tank's group, that Shaman will attempt to
keep a Grounding Totem down in range of the main tank to absorb Shock
Blast. This should continue in Phase 3.
- Ranged bots will spread out in a semicircle around the center of the
arena.
- If any bot other than the main tank gets Static Charge, it will run
away from other bots. If the main tank gets Static Charge, other bots
will run away from the main tank. This method should continue in Phase
3.
- If any bot is Entangled and has Static Charge, the bot will attempt to
use Cloak of Shadows if it is a Rogue, and Paladins will attempt to use
Hand of Freedom. This method should continue in Phase 3 (with some
modifications).
- Bots will not use Bloodlust or Heroism (saved for Phase 3). Bots will
not use any other major cooldowns, either, such as Metamorphosis (saved
for Phase 2 and 3).

**Phase 2**:
There are two central mechanics to this phase, both of which were
challenging to get bots to execute properly. First is the system of
prioritizing adds. The large playing field and multiple types of adds
coming from random directions make this phase not doable with realistic
DPS under the standard Playerbots target selection system. Therefore, I
took inspiration from liyunfan's Naxx strategy for Phase 1 of Kel'Thuzad
to disable dps assist and create a custom target selection system.

First, a cheat with respect to the Coilfang Striders: 
- Tanks will permanently have the Fear Ward aura applied to them if you
have raid cheats enabled. This allows them to tank the Coilfang
Striders. The standard strategy was to have an Elemental Shaman kite the
Strider around the perimeter of the arena, with ranged players
(including healers) spamming DoTs on the Strider. If you can make bots
do this, then great, but it's far beyond my capabilities. Therefore,
with the cheat, the first assistant tank is responsible for tanking
Striders and keeping them away from Core passers (described below) and
Vashj. Evidently it was (and is, in TBC Classic) possible to tank (and
melee DPS) Striders by wearing a Dire Maul Ogre Suit, which would give
you enough reach to stay out of the Strider's fear. I actually tried
that, and it does not work, either because AC's radiuses are not the
same or just because bots do not maintain the same level of precise
positioning. But anyway, the point is that technically the Striders are
tankable by real players, so maybe that will make you feel better about
using this cheat (it's fine enough rationalizing for me). I found this
fight to be unmanageable without this cheat (i.e., using a method that
would only have bots try to run away from Striders) because each Strider
was guaranteed to wipe out a couple of bots, and you really cannot
afford to lose anyone. YMMV though.
- If cheats are enabled for Striders, Hunters will attempt to Misdirect
the Striders to the first assist tank.
- If cheats are not enabled, bots will attempt to use slows/roots to
stop the Striders. I have some logic for them to use Netherweave Nets,
but I suspect it does not actually work so I may remove it instead of
trying to get it to function properly.

Target priority is as follows:
- Hunters and Mages: Enchanted Elementals, Coilfang Striders, Coilfang
Elites.
- Other Ranged Bots: Elites, Striders, Elementals. 
- Melee DPS: Elementals, Elites.
- Tanks: Elites, Elementals (except if cheats are enabled, the first
assistant tank will instead prioritize Striders and then Elementals)
- Everybody else (basically means healers): Elementals, Elites, Striders
- If there is more than one of the same target, bots will prioritize the
one that is closer to Vashj.
- In all cases, the valid attack ranged is limited so that bots should
not leave the central platform.
- If somehow a bot ends up too far from the center of the room and is
not actively attacking anything, there is logic to make them run back.

Handling Tainted Elementals and the Tainted Core: I will make another
post about this later. It is easily the most complicated strategy I've
ever worked on (far beyond anything on Kael'thas even) so will
necessitate a long explanation. The tl;dr is that there is a chain of
two-to-four bots that receive/pass the Tainted Core before using it on a
Shield Generator, and if you are playing by yourself, you probably need
to turn raid cheats on, in which case there will also be a bot that
teleports to, kills, and loots the Tainted Elementals (i.e., the bots
will then handle the entire sequence of shutting down Shield
Generators).

**Phase 3**:
- The main tank will pick up Vashj immediately and try to keep her away
from Enchanted Elementals.
- DPS will burn down residual adds from Phase 2 in the order of (1)
elementals, (2) strider for ranged only (if you have more than one up,
you're dead), and (3) elites (hopefully you have only one up, but two
with one almost dead is possible).
- Hunters will kill Toxic Sporebats. This works quite well, but they
(and anybody else if ordered to target Sporebats) have a tendency to
levitate up into the pipes at the top of the room when killing the
Sporebats. To counteract this, a method forcibly teleports bots to the
ground if they get more than 2 yards above the ground.
- The Phase 1 Cloak of Shadows/Hand of Freedom method is now expanded to
include bots Entangled in the Sporebat poison pools (with Hand of
Freedom usage prioritized on the main tank).
- There is a specific method to avoid the Sporebat poison pools. The
Vashj tank will move backwards when avoiding poison.

---------

Co-authored-by: kadeshar <kadeshar@gmail.com>
2026-02-08 12:31:23 +01:00
Crow
b31bda85ee
Refactor raid strategy framework (#2069)
# Pull Request

The purposes of this PR are to (1) establish a general raid helper
framework for the benefit of future raid strategies and (2) make some
improvements to problematic areas of the raid strategy code.

List of changes:
1. Added new RaidBossHelpers.cpp and RaidBossHelpers.h files in the Raid
folder.

3. Moved reused helpers from Karazhan, Gruul, and Magtheridon strategies
to the new helper files.
4. Modified the prior function that assigned a DPS bot to store and
erase timers and trackers in associative containers--the function now
includes parameters for mapId (so a bot that is not in the instance will
not be assigned) and for the ability to exclude a bot (useful for
excluding particular important roles, such as a Warlock tank, so they
are not bogged down by these extra tasks at critical moments). I also
renamed it from IsInstanceTimerManager to IsMechanicTrackerBot.
5. Moved all helper files in raid strategies to Util folders (was needed
for ICC, MC, and Ulduar).
6. Renamed and reordered includes of Ulduar files in AiObjectContext.cpp
to match other raid strategies.
a. This initially caused compile errors which made me realize that the
existing code had several problems with missing includes and was
compiling only due to the prior ordering in AiObjectContext.cpp.
Therefore, I added the missing includes to Molten Core, Ulduar, and
Vault of Archavon strategies.
b. Ulduar and Old Kingdom were also using the same constant name for a
spell--the reordering caused a compile error here as well, which just
highlighted an existing problem that was being hidden. I renamed the
constant for Ulduar to fix this, but I think the better approach going
forward would be to use a namespace or enum class. But that is for
another time and probably another person.
7. Several changes with respect to Ulduar files:
a. The position constants and enums for spells and NPCs and such were in
the trigger header file. I did not think that made sense so moved them
to existing helper files.
b. Since the strategy does not use multipliers, I removed all files and
references to multipliers in it.
c. I removed some unneeded includes. I did not do a detailed review to
determine what else could be removed--I just took some out that I could
tell right away were not needed.
d. I renamed the ingame strategy name from "uld" to "ulduar," which I
think is clearer and is still plenty short.
8. Partial refactor of Gruul and Magtheridon strategies:
a. I did not due a full refactoring but made some quick changes to
things I did previously that were rather stupid like repeating
calculations, having useless logic like pointless IsAlive() checks for
creatures already on the hostile references list, and not using the
existing Position class for coordinates.
b. There were a few substantive changes, such as allowing players to
pick Maulgar mage and moonkin tanks with the assistant flag, but a
greater refactoring of the strategies themselves is beyond this PR.
c. I was clearing some containers used for Gruul and Magtheridon
strategies; the methods are now fixed to erase only the applicable keys
so that in the unlikely event that one server has multiple groups
running Gruul or Magtheridon at the same time, there won't be timer or
position tracker conflicts.

## How to Test the Changes

1. Enter any raid instance that has any code impacted by this PR
2. Engage bosses and observe if any strategies are now broken

I personally tested Maulgar, Gruul, and Magtheridon and confirmed that
they still work as intended.

## Complexity & Impact

I do not expect this PR to have any relevant changes to in-game
performance, but I will defer to those more knowledgeable than I if
there are concerns in this area. As I've mentioned before, you can
consider me to be like a person who has taken half an intro C++ course
at best.

## AI Assistance

None beyond autocomplete of repetitive changes.

---------

Co-authored-by: bashermens <31279994+hermensbas@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-06 11:55:43 -08:00
bashermens
13fff46fa0
Improper singletons migration to clean Meyer's singletons (cherry-pick) (#2082)
# Pull Request

- Applies the clean and corrected singletons, Meyer pattern. (cherry
picked from @SmashingQuasar )

Testing by just playing the game in various ways. Been tested by myself
@Celandriel and @SmashingQuasar
---

## Complexity & Impact

- Does this change add new decision branches?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)

- Does this change increase per-bot or per-tick processing?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**describe and justify impact**)

- Could this logic scale poorly under load?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

---

## Defaults & Configuration

- Does this change modify default bot behavior?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**explain why**)

---

## AI Assistance

- Was AI assistance (e.g. ChatGPT or similar tools) used while working
on this change?
    - [x] No
    - [ ] Yes (**explain below**)
---

## Final Checklist

- [x] Stability is not compromised
- [x] Performance impact is understood, tested, and acceptable
- [x] Added logic complexity is justified and explained
- [x] Documentation updated if needed

---

## Notes for Reviewers

Anything that significantly improves realism at the cost of stability or
performance should be carefully discussed
before merging.

---------

Co-authored-by: Nicolas Lebacq <nicolas.cordier@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Keleborn <22352763+Celandriel@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-01-30 21:49:37 +01:00
gtkk
f5711dc6f7
FIX Onyxia Crash (#2062)
Solve these two problems #2043 #1981
@Regrad is the main contributor of the code, while I was just helping to
submit the pull request. Express my gratitude to him.
After testing, the code is proven to be effective.
2026-01-25 14:03:53 +01:00
Crow
378254af3f
Fix Assistant Assignment Functions (#1930)
IsHealAssistantOfIndex() and IsRangedDpsAssistantOfIndex() are supposed
to iterate through the group and first return members with the
applicable role that have the assistant flag, and then iterate through
non-assistants only if there are not enough assistants for the
designated index. They are not written properly and actually completely
ignore the assistant flag.

I rely on these functions for significant roles in SSC and TK (which I
have decided I'll PR in the same way as SSC, as a long-term draft). I
have them fixed on my own fork, but it is problematic for testers if
these functions do not work.

So I've done three things here:
1. Fixed the functions to prefer members with the assistant flag.
2. Added a third parameter for ignoreDeadPlayers, like
IsAssistTankOfIndex() has. Note that the parameter is by default false
for IsAssistTankOfIndex(), meaning dead players are _not_ ignored. This
is not my preferred design choice--I think the default should be to
ignore dead players, but I have not changed the default and have made
the default the same for IsAssistHealOfIndex() and
IsAssistRangedDpsOfIndex(), since I don't know the intent of the
pre-existing boss strats that use the functions.
3. Changed the names to IsAssistHealOfIndex() and
IsAssistRangedDpsOfIndex() so they parallel IsAssistTankOfIndex(), and
made corresponding changes in the few boss strats that use the
functions.

Also, note that the functions _do _not_ exclude real players. I think
there are arguments for and against excluding real players. A fourth
parameter for this could be useful, but I've not made any change in that
regard.
2026-01-24 21:26:49 +01:00
bashermens
3d467ce3bb
Added some additional defense checks around isHostile and unit/target (#2056)
Needs second pair of eyes, they appear in crash logs here and there. Its
merely a patch on a open wound.

----
As in aslong there multithreads in mapupdate, which we need for decent
performance and core calls are not done correctly due various reasons.
These type of issues remain.

Although i am planning to experiment a little with threadsafe execution
of our strategies vs performance.

The most effective thing we could do is check every single action and
check its stateless and where it does effect the state or read the state
of a core object its done in the safest way. flags, worldthread where
possible and/ot simply taking into account the state might be invalid.
2026-01-24 20:41:12 +01:00
bashermens
41c53365ae
[HOT FIX] MS build issues regarding folder / command lenght usage or rc.exe (#2038) 2026-01-19 22:45:28 +01:00